Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It does when those books were purposely excluded because the author was female. It also matters a lot when one of the books excluded was written by the person who was actually closest to Jesus too. Which book was this? How do we know about it, and have you read it?
Background as to why Mary Magdalenes account is so important when discussing Jesus and the New Testament. Also shows the tension and resentment some apparently had towards her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Magdalene Gospel of Mary Magdalene is a book that is believed to be an account of her albeit not directly written by her. Though it should be noted that there are some disagreements about whether other books…
This is life. There will always be tensions, envy, politics and resentment whenever people come together, regardless of gender. Jesus was betrayed by one of his very own disciples after-all.
So you say you've read the whole bible, but have you read the gospel of Mary Magdalene which you consider would "redeem" the bible by? Why, haven't you read it?
> Gospel of Mary Magdalene is a book that is believed to be an account of her albeit not directly written by her.
There are many books in the bible that give a females account. You should know about them as someone who's read the whole book (an impressive feat).
And what do you think of the many other books omitted from the bible, for example the gospel of Thomas? Is it because it was written by a man?
> This last link helps illustrate how the Bible is collated by man to fit a narrative defined by man.
Is there really anything in this world that is written and collated that does not fit a narrative defined by their authors?
> Which should cast scepticism about the motives behind the various rewrites and decisions behind what gets included and what doesn’t.
The changes have been greatly exaggarated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ5cgQUJnrI