231–240 of 470 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So initial vs subsequent encounter are completely different codes? Wouldn't this approach double the number of codes? Why wouldn't this be some other field of data associated with the form instead of mixing it up in the diagnostic 'topic'. I know nothing about medical diagnosis codes.
Pretty sure its just a suffix That indicates a second encounter with the patient
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_infer... --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partially_ordered_set --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_relation --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_sequence ...
Even if I think I know what's being discussed in the article, there's always some interesting extra detail or alternative way of explaining things that's worth reading.
Quite nice now and again.
I grew up when the History Channel was nicknamed the "Hitler channel". I've read Manchester's the Last Lion, Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, and will soon be ordering Ullrich's Hitler - Ascent. Saving Private Ryan is in my top 5 favorite movies of all time.
This is currently my wallpaper: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/59/US_Army...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't even... why in the world would it be important for a doctor to differentiate being struck by a dolphin or struck by orca (side note: orcas are dolphins!).
This was puzzling me (as a UK citizen). A clue in another comment hinted that it is about insurance. Still not sure why a dolphin would be covered in a policy but not an orca...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuatha_D%C3%A9_Danann
I also love watching philosophy videos on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpkRh3qVh_Y
I also highly recommend BBCs "In Our Time" series. Quality broadcasting covering innumerable subjects about history and philosophy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least you learn something from reading these sorts of sites. Heroin doesn't do that...then again I may just be justifying an addiction.
Some neuroscientists would argue that addiction is a form of "learning".
