Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

news.ycombinator.com

221–230 of 239 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don’t worry big companies still can’t copy anything quickly, even with AI. Why? Because before they can ship a single feature, they’ll need to schedule 42 alignment meetings, debate AI-generated slide decks, and log their “strategic pivots” into an AI-curated Jira board. The real moat isn’t just code it’s speed, focus, user trust, and the ability to actually ship. Those are things bloated orgs struggle with, with or…

In a previous big-tech job, we called this the "Release Prevention Team".

As a customer, I often find myself talking to the very similar Sales Prevention Team.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#222

Big companies are not your worry in most cases. They have so much bureaucracy and internal politics that it's often cheaper for them to buy out the up-and-coming startups than it is to build in-house. Instead, if you achieve success without much of a moat, you will be cloned by one of the "App Store mills". These are companies who employ multiple small teams (think 3-4 people), and each team is charged with cloning o…

> you will be cloned by one of the "App Store mills".

Is this happening for SaaS apps too. With AI assistance, most SaaS apps feel achievable in 6 weeks.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#223
post #4

In my experience (enterprise software), customers buy our products not because we have a moat or some hard-to-achieve technical advantage but because they can speak to us in their words, they know we care, and we try solve their problems quickly. Just yesterday I was speaking with the COO of a $200M/yr revenue company in the supply chain space. He'd learned Claude Code and built a couple apps to solve internal proble…

> There is an endless list of problems to solve As an indie hacker I often struggle to find new ideas. Are there any practical strategies for discovering these real pain points?

Talk to customers. Listen to their problems. Build a prototype. See if they will pay for it. Repeat.

As a founder I spend as much time as I can with customers. They tell us what to build.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#224
Let's take that thought for a second: " big companies can copy your product in no time"

How will big companies know your revenue and the number of paying customers you have?

Before you even get there, you'll have made generational wealth pretty much. They made tons of clones of Agario but none of them were as good.

The problem is finding a solid idea and marketing it to people. That's the harder part. Programming is still hard despite vibe coders churning out slop but not as hard.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are still milking the product they launched 20 years ago, doing slight periodic updates to match innovations of others with few years delay. They are about as good at making new products as Google and Facebook.

I'd say it depends on your definition of "good", since the revenue seems to suggest they're doing something most people agree with.

By that logic, the online scam industry is shipping the best products of all time. By some estimates they make over a trillion a year.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#226

Short answer: yes, but the “moat” has changed. A lot of people still think moats are about features. They’re not anymore. Features are cheap now. Execution and distribution are the real bottlenecks. Big companies can copy your product, but they usually won’t copy: – your speed early on – your willingness to serve a tiny, unsexy niche – your ability to change direction without internal politics In practice, most start…

You nailed right Most startups die because they optimize too much and have no real users

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#227
post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say it depends on your definition of "good", since the revenue seems to suggest they're doing something most people agree with.

By that logic, the online scam industry is shipping the best products of all time. By some estimates they make over a trillion a year.

IMO false equivalence... scams are designed purely to steal money from people, while Apple products carry intrinsic value and benefit to most people.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#228
post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By that logic, the online scam industry is shipping the best products of all time. By some estimates they make over a trillion a year.

IMO false equivalence... scams are designed purely to steal money from people, while Apple products carry intrinsic value and benefit to most people.

I realize it's a strained equivalence, but Apple makes a lot of money violating EU anticompetitive laws. Their stranglehold over app distribution is not entirely dissimilar to ransome.

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#229
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t do side projects related to computers and never have in 30 years. But I still use a Trello board to keep myself organized

Ironically I use a vibe-coded Trello clone with some tweaks for my specific workflow...

Care to share those tweaks?

Re: Ask HN: Is it still worth pursuing a software startup?

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook cannot make products, its that simple.

Or Google Large companies struggle to launch anything due to their staff size. They're as inefficient as a government

google makes products, they mostly suck at making platforms, and their most notable platform (android) was purchased, though one can argue gsuite/workspace as a platform, but one might also argue that its more just an amalgamation of projects.

One can see this from the failure of google+ (and killing off beloved apps, like reader on its altar, when I would argue if they are thinking platform, the idea is to make any app insert data into the platform, you don't want to push away users, you want to get them using the platform with them even knowing it).

Or their disjointed messaging strategy for many years (which might not even matter, they seemingly have given up on it?). It shouldn't matter what messaging app someone uses, let it use a common platform. Spend the money on figuring out how to make them use a common platform, because killing their app just pushes them away and you are not guaranteed that they will move to your new app vs something else. Moving their old app to your new platform, again, keeps them as users, increases the value of the platform (as more users are inserting dfata into it) which makes it more valuable to others to do the same. One might have different apps geared towards differ things (someone might be happy with just text messaging, another might want video and text messaging, but if you kill the first guy's app and expect him to move, he might just as quickly move to whatsapp or something else).

Post reply on HN