Interview puzzles are so hit-or-miss. No matter how many of them I solve, I always stutter when I'm faced with a new one. If the problem is new, it either "clicks" right away or I bomb the interview. No middle ground. It may helpful to consider that the current interview system is, literally, designed to make you fail. That is to say: not with 100% certainty -- and on some level, they want at least some of the candid…
Ordinarily I'd just upvote this, but (because it echoes parts of what my own post higher in the thread mentions) I want to call it out. These hiring practices are part of the fuck-you,-I'm-smarter culture that makes tech gross and lame. It is so important to realize that you are not the problem, it is , unless you choose to work to perpetuate that culture. It literally is not your fault. As a reward for that realizat…
My only point is that it may be helpful to treat it as a (temporarily unavoidable) externality, and deal with as one does with other annoyances in life that one has to (temporarily) slog through from time to time.