Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

news.ycombinator.com

211–220 of 508 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#211

There is nothing more illogical in modern society than commuting to an office every day. Employees waste 2 of their 16 available waking hours in the non-productive commute while incurring significant financial costs (lease/insurance/fuel/energy) in order to support this patently absurd activity. Employers waste time and energy negotiating leases, re-arranging offices, purchasing AV equipment for meeting rooms, etc.,…

Very true. And I did some rough estimations on why my employer wants us in the office. They make $115k a month of employees buying coffee. That is only coffee, and that was a very conservative estimate of only 40% of employees buying only a coffee on an average of $2. This doesn't take into account parking we have to pay for, or lunch, or snacks.

> They make $115k a month of employees buying coffee ... parking we have to pay for, or lunch, or snacks

Lol what? Why are they making you pay for these things?

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very true. And I did some rough estimations on why my employer wants us in the office. They make $115k a month of employees buying coffee. That is only coffee, and that was a very conservative estimate of only 40% of employees buying only a coffee on an average of $2. This doesn't take into account parking we have to pay for, or lunch, or snacks.

You have to pay for the coffee?!

In many countries yes.

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree, yes zoning changes could be needed, but the presence of more daytime workers at home in suburban areas creates new opportunities for restaurants, coffee shops, and other conveniences that cater to those workers.

Right, so the main road will have a Starbucks off it

I mean yes and. There's an entire industry of restaurants that cater to providing food to workers in business districts. They move to where the people are. I don't think suburban neighborhoods having hyperlocal businesses would ever be considered a bad thing.

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#214
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, there are some inefficiencies with sprawl. There are also mental health issues with dense cities.

100% with you on that. I live 4km from the city centre, so essentially walking distance. I went there on the weekend. It's very lively, but I wouldn't want this sort of liveliness during the evening when the only thing I need is to wind down. I prefer living here, halfway from the centre to the city limits.

Exactly, that and issues like the lack of greenery that's consistently linked to poorer mental health outcomes, increased stress, etc.

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but many offices are likely to be converted to other uses, rather than persist with partial occupation. Hotel, residential etc People often say it’s cost prohibitive, but it’s been done many times before, and valuations of Offices will get so depressed that conversions begin to look very lucrative

Large office buildings do not convert into hotels or residential all that well. Most of them have all of their plumbing and utilities in the central core. That's not easy to retrofit. They may also not be up to code for residential use.

Many have been converted before, even in the recent past, Google it.

https://www.washingtonian.com/2022/11/14/dc-area-leads-the-w...

And plumbing and wiring a building is vastly cheaper than building a new one from scratch.

Most modern office buildings are already designed so their tenants can orient the space however they like, Including adding/removing walls and plumbing/electric

If you can buy office buildings at half the valuation of a similar square footage residential building, converting it will obviously be profitable. It was already profitable in many cases pre Covid before office became severely depressed. The valuation gap between residential and office has probably never been wider

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Musk's text message conversation during Twitter-lawsuit discovery I only saw this now : https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/09/elon-... It's actually kind of incredible how it all seems to work. The cringe too of the fawning is a good indicator why Musk feels he can do whatever he likes, including attempting to troll everyone on his board. It seems so juvenile.

Important to note that wealth doesn't improve your character; it simply amplifies who you already are.

It's also incredibly lonely at times - despite being constantly surrounded by people - which I figure can warp your mind much like too much solitary confinement can. I don't say this from personal experience (un)fortunately, I say this as someone who has a family member that is a confidant of a billionaire from the middle-east (whom I'll refer to as Bob.) The family member is one of their close staff - travels with them everywhere and is in close proximity, daily - and possibly their most intimate friend as a result of this close proximity for the better part of 40 years, and the below.

In Bob's life he is surrounded by sycophants waiting for handouts, never wanting to be seen to annoy Bob nor lose his favour. Bob does not know who to trust. He has had those that he considered real friends and deeply trustworthy turn out to be thiefs and liars. A former school friend was secretly living in one of Bob's holiday homes _for years_, successfully evading detection by Bob by using his friendship to know where and when Bob will be. He was using his ties to Bob (and Bob's success) to gain favour in his own business and was using some of this money to bribe Bob's staff into silence. Apparently the friend went full "villain in disguise reveals his secret vendetta" when Bob asked if the friend needs help. Bob was heartbroken.

Maids, servers, and other staff are stealing things all the time - Bob maintains and reviews an inventory of stolen property with his security detail, with monthly targets... theft of his belongings is an ever present cost to Bob. e Bob's own family live an excessively sheltered life. His young children's best friends are their personal body guards - former military personnel that must be present around the clock as a stipulation of their kidknap/ransom insurance. This isn't a perceived threat, either. Bob's eldest son was abducted on at least one occassion, by a policeman no less.

Bob's life is managed for him. His staff manage his diet, his wardrobe(s), his social diary, of course his work engagenments take him all over the world often with little notice. He is never entirely certain where he will be and when. He is a slave to his diaries.

Bob spends the majority of his birthdays alone, on the phone to my family member, often crying about how lonely he is.

All that for money seems like a lot to sacrifice. There's also a fascinating effect that happens when the cost of things are literally of no consequence. Sentimentality is the only measure of value and material objects are just.. nothing but utilities.

Anyway, I would safely assume being a billionaire is not all doom and gloom, but it certainly has a different set of life-problems.

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The average commute in a large city is definitely not 2-3 hours one way .

Come to New York, then. I have sad news for you. DC was even worse.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publicatio..., page 7

Average commute time in NYC MSA is 37.7 minutes, longest of any major MSA in the country. DC MSA is 35.6 minutes. Only ~23% of NYC have commutes longer than hour, and ~18% in DC.

(Note: statistics are using 2019 data, so doesn't account for anything COVID related, and people who don't commute are excluded from the statistics.)

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#218

We used to spend $400 a month on gasoline because we both commuted 25 minutes each way. During the pandemic that was down to about $100 a month. And when we did have to go somewhere the traffic was so much lower so less wasting gas in stop and go traffic. I'm supposed to go in 3 days a week. In reality I go in once a week for a few hours and no one cares as 90% of the people on my project are in other offices. I told…

Go into the office for enhanced collaboration they say. Everyone I work with is in different countries, so being in the office gains nothing. Being at home is much nicer.

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm in NJ- my commute into the city is an hour. Most people that I know of have commutes in the 30-90 minute range, throughout NJ, NYC, and Connecticut

I live in Western Suffolk County. I never commuted to the City, but many of my friends do. Driving is 90 minutes, if you leave at 5AM. Train is 2 hours (including in-city time). Many folks commute from even farther East. Please don’t tell me that I’m “insane.” I would never have done that commute, myself, but have lived here for over 30 years, and have seen (with my own little eyes), people doing this every day.

I did not call you insane- that was another commenter.

I also don't doubt there are long commutes. However, I will assert that that is not the typical experience in New York, or elsewhere. No one in my at-work peer group has a commute that long, and no one in my outside-of-work friend group has a commute that long.

Re: Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environment initiative?

#220

Because corporations are doing the majority of that pro-environmental advertising. I mean that both in terms of companies making changes (both real and greenwashing) and the News/Media corporations reporting on it. Telecommuting could be absolutely massive for reduced emissions, could bring down urban house prices, improve inter-family relationships, and revitalized suburban neighborhoods (e.g. more walkable areas).…

> Musk's text message conversation during Twitter-lawsuit discovery I only saw this now : https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/09/elon-... It's actually kind of incredible how it all seems to work. The cringe too of the fawning is a good indicator why Musk feels he can do whatever he likes, including attempting to troll everyone on his board. It seems so juvenile.

I don't think it's that weird, there not a lot of differences between people at the top or at the bottom.

It's the fact that they were idealized that makes this dip into their intimacy so strange.

But basically, those communications look a lot like ones that I would have with my own friends. And when I was a students, we were careful about spending 10 euros. Now, we have casual chats about buying a sauna for the garden, and if you think about it, it would sound crazy to someone making minimum wage.

If I had billions, I would talk as casually about huge amounts for actions with big consequences, because I'm still ...me. And I would still make jokes like "you have my sword" since we quote LOTR for fun, not because of social status. What? You thougth billionaires were taking all their texts seriously?

Also, calling people out for making mistake that cost you is kinda what everybody sane does. And apologizing to people when you made a mistake is not being submissive, it's being decent. Again, it reads like text I would send myself.

All in all, it seems pretty standard human behavior to me.

Now you may feel shocked that regular humans have so much power, but remember:

- a lot of luck is involved

- some skills like managing stress or being persistent may matter more than a lot others and those people may have much more than the average person

- this is by design in our system, the problem therefore is not that humans are humans, but that our system promote profiles that you don't think deserve it

- nevertheless, managing tesla or spacex is not something most people would succeed at, so there is probably some human traits those texts are not showing that make them capable of doing billions of dollars of operations

Post reply on HN