Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

news.ycombinator.com

211–220 of 447 posts

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#211
post #24

I work for a small financial SaaS in Boston. 30-50 people. Nobody offshore. I've worked here for 18 years and 11 months and a couple of days. Yes, we're hiring. The best thing about the company are the people who are already here. The basic hiring criteria are "clever, competent and kind". That doesn't mean we never have disagreements, but they tend to be technical disagreements about the best approach to reach the s…

Just curious if you don’t mind can you share the name of the company you work for

I work for Smartleaf -- www.smartleaf.com

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#212

Whoever pays the most. At some point most of us get inspired by WuTang and take the "Cash Rules Everything Around Me" mentality. Work is where we trade our bodies and our limited lifespan for money 8-12 hours per day. I personally just shut my brain off or detach completely, get my work done, then get back to my life. Whoever pays the most sucks less. Otherwise, all things being equal, all companies are going to suck…

I personally work for myself, and I have found it to be very rewarding and fulfilling. It's not for everyone, but for for some it is certainly far more rewarding than working a 9-5. Especially one where you feel like you have to turn off your brain for 8 hours which I find to be very unfortunate.

To some extent I agree with your mentality. I don't think we should treat work as anything other than that - trading your limited time for money. But you spend so much of it on this thing, work, that turning off your brain to engage in it seems just depressing.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#213
post #193
post #53

I loved every minute of my time working at Netflix. Great, talented coworkers who I could constantly learn from, management chain from bottom to top of former engineers, so they understood when you would say, "I worked on this for a week but have no results because it didn't work". Plenty of resources to do what you needed to do, and lots of autonomy to do what you thought was right. Very little process and upper man…

I’ll second this. Netflix was one of my favorite places to work as well for mostly the same reasons. Having said that I do hear they are getting bigger and things have changed somewhat recently. So YMMV. Edit: it’s also nice to not have ethical concerns with your choice of employer.

Are you immensely pleased.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The flip side of this sentiment is expressed quite eloquently in a sibling comment. In fact, we might even say the commenter is "crushing it": One challenge is that even in sucky workplaces, there always seem to be champions that will tell you how great it is. If I hear people say they are (or were) miserable at a certain job - I tend to take their word when they say there's a reason for it. Your take seems to be...…

>> If I hear people say they are (or were) miserable at a certain job - I tend to take their word when they say there's a reason for it Like I said, there's an objective and a subjective here. I mainly found that people who are miserable at a job were miserable at every other job too. Doesn't totally mean it's "them" but it's kinda like "the only common in all your failed relationships is you." Then there's the total…

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#216
post #114
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly the biggest issue with this strategy is US capitalism isn't kind to companies that just stay small. You're not going to find a lot of places that want to remain tiny, just a lot that, as mentioned above, remain so through micromanagement. Maybe you get lucky and find a labor-of-love kinda place where someone is just trying to be really good at making one type of thing (highly niche products) but a better bet…

I suspect that a lot of these companies just don't make a lot of noise, but quietly do their thing without being pasted all over the HN front page.

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#217
I have had amazing managers and coworkers at Google. People that cared for me as a person, helped me grow technically and supported me career.

Obviously at a huge company there will be a lot of variance, but on my teams I have had a lot of autonomy to choose what to work on and how to make it happen. That was a big reason why I enjoyed it so much there.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#218

I've been at Facebook for about a year and a half. Before this I was at startups in the marketing and financial industries. We've been under scrutiny for the whole time that I've been there, and the company is pretty unpopular from a vocal population on here, but it's been really nice to work for. We obviously have job security, and I've been very impressed with the management chain above me. At least on my team, the…

[flagged]

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#219
post #53

I loved every minute of my time working at Netflix. Great, talented coworkers who I could constantly learn from, management chain from bottom to top of former engineers, so they understood when you would say, "I worked on this for a week but have no results because it didn't work". Plenty of resources to do what you needed to do, and lots of autonomy to do what you thought was right. Very little process and upper man…

Cool! Is it still like that, even today? Netflix is possibly my "reach" job, based specifically on what I've read about the culture.

I'm about equally split talent wise between "mathy things" (signal processing) and lower level systems engineering. "video & image encoding" or "research scientist - algorithms engineering" look hot to me.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#220
I work for a small financial company called Cypher.trade (building out a futures platform on Solana) and I really like working there. Everyone in the team is amazingly skilled and management is hands-off but detailed enough for you to know exactly what to do.

I find the company refreshing because:

- They allow remote workers in any time zone

- Expectations for engineers are reasonable

- The requirements for the product are well defined

- Team members are competent

- Communication is decent

This honestly avoids many of the problems I've had to deal with early on in my career. It has been a good place to work for so far. If you have experience with trading systems, solana, 'smart contracts', cryptography, or web3 maybe shoot an email to offpisteprotocol@protonmail.com or DM the twitter account https://twitter.com/cypher_protocol.

I think this company would be a good place to work for just about anyone. You will need to be curious and self-motivated to get a job there. Consider applying if you're a reasonably skilled technical person.

Post reply on HN