Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Only America uses the (nonsensical) MM-DD-YYYY system. It makes more sense as MMDD-YYYY or (MM-DD)-YYYY. The Month-Day is a single thing, there are 365 of them in a year, in a roughly base 30 counting system. The year can often be left off when colloquially referring to a date (3/14 or 0314 for example.)
Just trying to reason here: I think it makes more sense to have DD/MM as the day is the thing that changes more often and thus DDMM starts with the most important information first. Also if I think I never encountered someone looking at their digital watch to know what Month is. But always people check phones/watches to know what day is. So why would these systems start with the less important information for the use…
Day before month creates some ambiguity regarding if you’re talking about the near past or near future.
If you consider MMDD a single unit, it doesn’t make sense to represent it backwards. You need to be able to tell that 0402 is a bigger base iterarion than 0302. If it’s DDMM 0203 and 0204 don’t appear to be an entire base count apart.