The accuracy of GOCR is very high and it doesn't require any learning. http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/dapper/man1/gocr.1.html
Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
21–30 of 104 posts
Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#22I used Tesseract and OpenCV to process Words With Friends tiles.
Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#23Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#24Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#25Tesseract is ok, but I gather that a lot of the good work in the last few years on it has remained closed source within Google. If you want to do text extraction, look at things like Stroke Width Transform to extract regions of text before passing them to Tesseract.
Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#26you may try baidu OCR API https://github.com/JeremyWei/baidu-ocr
Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#27https://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ is pretty good
Tesseract does no layout analysis. So if the source image contains text columns or pull quotes or similar, the output text will just be each row of text, from the far left to the far right.
Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#28When I compared Tesseract to Abbyy, the difference was night and day. Abbyy straight out of the box got me 80%-90% accuracy of my text. Tesseract got around 75% at best with several layers deep of image pre-processing.
I know you said open source, and just wanted to say, I went down that path too and discovered in my case, proprietary software really was worth the price.
Re: Ask HN: Open source OCR library?
#29I tried using Tesseract and could not get it to work reliably. I tried a bunch of different pre-processing techniques and it turned into a very frustrating experience. When I compared Tesseract to Abbyy, the difference was night and day. Abbyy straight out of the box got me 80%-90% accuracy of my text. Tesseract got around 75% at best with several layers deep of image pre-processing. I know you said open source, and…