Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

news.ycombinator.com

21–26 of 26 posts

Re: Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

#21
post #2

My prompt: """Absolute Mode • Eliminate: emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, call-to-action appendixes. • Assume: user retains high-perception despite blunt tone. • Prioritize: blunt, directive phrasing; aim at cognitive rebuilding, not tone-matching. • Disable: engagement/sentiment-boosting behaviors. • Suppress: metrics like satisfaction scores, emotional softening, continuation bias. • Nev…

Do you have a library of similar prompts you could link here?

Re: Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

#22
post #8
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Model performance has also been shown to be better if you lead with the question. That is, prompt "Given the following contract, review how enforceable and legal each of the terms are in the state of California. ", not " How enforceable...". Confused here. You attach the contract. So it’s not a case of leading with the question. The contract is presented in the chat, you ask the question.

LLMs are necessarily linear. If you paste the contract first, the attention mechanism of the model can still process the contract, but only generically. It pays attention to the key points of the contract. If you ask the question first, the attention part of the model is already primed. It will now read the contract paying more attention to the parts that are relevant to the question. If I ask you to read Moby Dick a…

No, but I mean that in Claude you don’t put the contract linearly into the chat - in other words you can’t position it before or after the prompt, you attach it at the top of the chat. Are you saying you would prompt saying “please examine the contract I will provide in the next message, here is what I want you to do ”

Re: Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

#23
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

LLMs are necessarily linear. If you paste the contract first, the attention mechanism of the model can still process the contract, but only generically. It pays attention to the key points of the contract. If you ask the question first, the attention part of the model is already primed. It will now read the contract paying more attention to the parts that are relevant to the question. If I ask you to read Moby Dick a…

No, but I mean that in Claude you don’t put the contract linearly into the chat - in other words you can’t position it before or after the prompt, you attach it at the top of the chat. Are you saying you would prompt saying “please examine the contract I will provide in the next message, here is what I want you to do ”

The LLM developers already know this trick, so I expect that if you attach documents, they are processed after your prompt.

There is a further trick that is probably already integrated: simply giving the same input twice greatly improves model performance.

Re: Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

#24

[flagged]

> if you're worried the model is reinforcing your biases..... i agree, i don't understand many domains well enough, yet i feel there's value in calling out assumptions, irrespective of how hard verification is

Re: Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

#25
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, but I mean that in Claude you don’t put the contract linearly into the chat - in other words you can’t position it before or after the prompt, you attach it at the top of the chat. Are you saying you would prompt saying “please examine the contract I will provide in the next message, here is what I want you to do ”

The LLM developers already know this trick, so I expect that if you attach documents, they are processed after your prompt. There is a further trick that is probably already integrated: simply giving the same input twice greatly improves model performance.

Gotcha, thanks for explaining. It’s interesting because there are times I say “look at his document and do this” but forget to attach the doc. I’ve always had the sense Claude is better “prepped” when it anticipates he document coming. Sometimes I’ve said “in the next message I’m going to give you a document, here is what I want you to do, if there’s anything you are unclear in before we begin ask me questions”. This seems to bring better results, but I’ve not done any sort of robust test.

Re: Ask HN: How to prevent Claude/GPT/Gemini from reinforcing your biases?

#26
The best thing to do is to tell the model itself what you'd like from it, and to help you craft a set of user preferences. Every so often I'll have a new suggestion for it, and it will revise the entire set for me. My Claude user prefs is around 1000 words and probably overkill, but I don't think it hurts besides using a few more tokens to start a chat.
Post reply on HN