Rtx 3090 24gb. Pretty affordable. Gos-oss:20b and qwen3 coder/instruct, devstrall are my usual. Ps. Definitely check out open-web ui.
Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
21–30 of 196 posts
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#22I've been using Ollama, Gemma3:12b is about all my little air can handle. If anyone has suggestions on other models, as an experiment I tried asking it to design me a new latex resumé and it struggled for two hours with the request to put my name prominently at the top in a grey box with my email and phone number beside it.
Not only are they a lot more recent than gemma, they seem really good at tool calling, so probably good for coding tools. I haven’t personally tried it myself for that.
The actual page is here: https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-1b
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#23I'm running mainly GPT-OSS-120b/20b depending on the task, Magistral for multimodal stuff and some smaller models I've fine-tuned myself for specific tasks..
All the software is implemented by myself, but I started out with basically calling out to llama.cpp, as it was the simplest and fastest option that let me integrate it into my own software without requiring a GUI.
I use Codex and Claude Code from time to time to do some mindless work too, Codex hooked up to my local GPT-OSS-120b while Claude Code uses Sonnet.
> What laptop hardware do you have (CPU, GPU/NPU, memory, whether discrete GPU or integrated, OS) and how it performs for your workflow?
Desktop, Ryzen 9 5950X, 128GB of RAM, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (96GB VRAM), performs very well and I can run most of the models I use daily all together, unless I want really large context then just GPT-OSS-120B + max context, ends up taking ~70GB of VRAM.
> What kinds of tasks you use it for (code completion, refactoring, debugging, code review) and how reliable it is (what works well / where it falls short).
Almost anything and everything, but mostly coding. But then general questions, researching topics, troubleshooting issues with my local infrastructure, troubleshooting things happening in my other hobbies and a bunch of other stuff. As long as you give the local LLM access to a search tool (I use YaCy + my own adapter), local models works better for me than the hosted models, mainly because of the speed and I have better control over the inference.
It does fall short on really complicated stuff. Right now I'm trying to do CUDA programming, creating a fused MoE kernel for inference in Rust, and it's a bit tricky as there are a lot of moving parts and I don't understand the subject 100%, and when you get to that point, it's a bit hit or miss. You really need to have a proper understanding of what you use the LLM for, otherwise it breaks down quickly. Divide and conquer as always helps a lot.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#24llama.cpp + Qwen3-4B running on older PC with AMD Radeon GPU (Vulcan). Users connect via web UI. Usually around 30 tokens/sec. Usable.
What do they use it for? It's a very small model
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#25Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#26In terms of models, qwen2.5-coder:3b is a good compromise for autocomplete, as agent choose pretty much just the biggest sota model you can run
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#27Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#28I've been using Ollama, Gemma3:12b is about all my little air can handle. If anyone has suggestions on other models, as an experiment I tried asking it to design me a new latex resumé and it struggled for two hours with the request to put my name prominently at the top in a grey box with my email and phone number beside it.
I was playing with the new IBM Granite models. They are quick/small and they do seem accurate. You can even try them online in the browser because they are small enough to be loaded via the filesystem: https://huggingface.co/spaces/ibm-granite/Granite-4.0-Nano-W... Not only are they a lot more recent than gemma, they seem really good at tool calling, so probably good for coding tools. I haven’t personally tried it my…
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#29For VSCode I use continue.dev as it allows to set my own (short) system prompt. I get around 50token/sec generation and prompt processing 550t/s.
When giving well defined small tasks, it is as good as any frontier model.
I like the speed and low latency and the availability while on the plane/train or off-grid.
Also decent FIM with the llama.cpp VSCode plugin.
If I need more intelligence my personal favourites are Claude and Deepseek via API.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#30I haven't found a local model that fits on a 64GB Mac or 128GB Spark yet that appears to be good enough to reliably run bash-in-a-loop over multiple turns, but maybe I haven't tried the right combination of models and tools.