MS provided a kernel-level entry point that other OSes didn't need.
MS have an aggressive auto-update policy that is anti-best practise.
MS have a signed binary agreement that doesn't catch the things it is meant to.
21–30 of 52 posts
MS provided a kernel-level entry point that other OSes didn't need.
MS have an aggressive auto-update policy that is anti-best practise.
MS have a signed binary agreement that doesn't catch the things it is meant to.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41009740
Such a file will not have the right signature and checksum to be considered a valid executable. Either these were not checked, or whatever was doing the checking responded poorly and left the system in a state that's difficult to recover.
> Would it happen on Linux? It absolutely would. Windows is way ahead in terms of driver isolation and stability. Most drivers cannot bring down the system (your GPU driver can crash, your screen will flicker and maybe apps that were using it will crash, but the system recovers). Not so on Linux unfortunately, any driver will bring the system down. More recently certain class of drivers have been making use of ebpf o…
I work for a company that provides secure endpoints that are Linux based (and can also run Windows apps without issue). We do not ship Linux kernels that contain drivers that cause crashes.
Per our IT patterns and also mandated by our commercial contracts, we investigate any crashes that occur. Over the last five years, not a single crash has been caused by a device driver.
We also will never have a use for the style of security software that Crowdstrike has. Our security stack is proactively preventative, not reactive or looking for "anomalies".
So this "it absolutely would [happen on Linux]", should have an asterisk, a huge one glaring like the sun, and without said asterisk is inaccurate at an extreme.
How many more cases and years you need to finally admit that windows is a shitty platform? Yes all platforms seen bad days and have their own issues. But windows is different - most of its troubles come from human factor - low quality people making (or made 10 years ago) low quality decisions and every new iteration is just another layer of bad decisions aimed to cover the holes in previous layer. You can see and fee…
I have dealt with an apple upgrade that ignored free disk space and let users continue to upgrade eventually filling up the drive. This will happen with any company with humans that can make mistakes. And apple suffers from horrible ui issues also. Most users just tend to ignore them. On Macos, activate mission control and try to lock the screen with the keyboard shortcut.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have dealt with an apple upgrade that ignored free disk space and let users continue to upgrade eventually filling up the drive. This will happen with any company with humans that can make mistakes. And apple suffers from horrible ui issues also. Most users just tend to ignore them. On Macos, activate mission control and try to lock the screen with the keyboard shortcut.
Windows and macOS are both total shit.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have dealt with an apple upgrade that ignored free disk space and let users continue to upgrade eventually filling up the drive. This will happen with any company with humans that can make mistakes. And apple suffers from horrible ui issues also. Most users just tend to ignore them. On Macos, activate mission control and try to lock the screen with the keyboard shortcut.
Cherry picking specific examples doesn’t prove anything. Overall windows ux is not even close to what apple have invested in their ecosystem. It’s not even apple to oranges comparison. Even if there are few nice and handy features here and there.
Apples can still be compared to oranges.
> Would it happen on Linux? It absolutely would. Windows is way ahead in terms of driver isolation and stability. Most drivers cannot bring down the system (your GPU driver can crash, your screen will flicker and maybe apps that were using it will crash, but the system recovers). Not so on Linux unfortunately, any driver will bring the system down. More recently certain class of drivers have been making use of ebpf o…
> Not so on Linux unfortunately, any driver will bring the system down. I work for a company that provides secure endpoints that are Linux based (and can also run Windows apps without issue). We do not ship Linux kernels that contain drivers that cause crashes. Per our IT patterns and also mandated by our commercial contracts, we investigate any crashes that occur. Over the last five years, not a single crash has bee…
But good job on not having a crash from a driver so far. Raspberry Pi users weren’t that lucky for example.
[0]: https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/bug-report-455-23-04-k...
> Would it happen on Linux? It absolutely would. Windows is way ahead in terms of driver isolation and stability. Most drivers cannot bring down the system (your GPU driver can crash, your screen will flicker and maybe apps that were using it will crash, but the system recovers). Not so on Linux unfortunately, any driver will bring the system down. More recently certain class of drivers have been making use of ebpf o…