Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: 4chan Archives Pre-2008?

news.ycombinator.com

21–25 of 25 posts

Re: Ask HN: 4chan Archives Pre-2008?

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It seems like it wouldn't be hard to train a model on this era of 4chan and create a simulacrum. Out of curiosity, are there any models trained on HN posts?

You're using one right now

The problem is that the model we’re using now is locked in the world’s most secure HSM and you can’t use several copies at once.

Re: Ask HN: 4chan Archives Pre-2008?

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It seems like it wouldn't be hard to train a model on this era of 4chan and create a simulacrum. Out of curiosity, are there any models trained on HN posts?

You're using one right now

Shadowbanned riding like the wind.. Gives model-citizen a whole new ring..

Re: Ask HN: 4chan Archives Pre-2008?

#23

It seems like it wouldn't be hard to train a model on this era of 4chan and create a simulacrum. Posts would happen at a certain frequency with all the users being simulated. I wonder if you could even allow user posts and have the model reply in a realistic way (bullying and all)?

The remarkable thing is how effective bullying is at moderating idiots. Astroturfing state actors aside, the site maintains a high level of on topic civility. There's something inherently wrong with ordering posts by vote count, both because a confident/deceptive idiot can spread his lies like a virus and because it's too easy to game.

On a small scale I've seen this work, and maybe early 4chan was like this.

Current-day, though? Nah, idiots attract more idiots and most of the site sucks save for a few niche boards/topics.

Re: Ask HN: 4chan Archives Pre-2008?

#24
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The remarkable thing is how effective bullying is at moderating idiots. Astroturfing state actors aside, the site maintains a high level of on topic civility. There's something inherently wrong with ordering posts by vote count, both because a confident/deceptive idiot can spread his lies like a virus and because it's too easy to game.

I'm reasonably sure this is the first time I've ever seen a claim associating civility with 4chan.

I suppose you need to be deep in the trenches to find anyone still willing to have discourse there. But as another commenter said, some of the niche boards, like subreddits, maintain some pretty high quality conversation.

Re: Ask HN: 4chan Archives Pre-2008?

#25

Soon to be a question asked about the entire internet pre-2019.

Since governments started to get more involved the more and more data lost forever. It’s good to see that at least projects like archive keeps it. But I’m afraid that will be lost too.
Post reply on HN