Math, physics, chemistry won't change. Who knows if software will be nearly recognizable in 10-20 years from now, but the reality of the world will not.
Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
21–30 of 99 posts
Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#22- Unless somebody finds a polynomial algorithm for an NP-complete problem (which is a taller order than just proving P=NP), several interesting problems will continue to be infeasible to solve exactly in the general case with large data.
- If, in addition, quantum computers don't prove to be viable, commonly used cryptosystems such as RSA, AES, ECC, will probably continue to be secure provided they're used correctly.
- Results like the Two Generals Problem, the CAP theorem, etc. will still make distributed systems difficult to work with and require tradeoffs.
- Rice's theorem, that it is impossible to determine computational properties of arbitrary programs, will still apply, making static analysis (including antivirus programs, security scans, etc.) heuristic rather than exact.
- etc.
Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#23People submitting Ask HN's without proofreading
Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#24Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#25Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#26Human nature, and the rate of learning.
I wonder about the latter. It's known that high quality, one-on-one teaching can greatly improve learning speed. Could near future generation AI learn to be a teacher on par with the best human ones?
I'm in edtech building this.
it's like having 1 teacher with 25 assistants.
Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#27People building things without first checking if anyone actually wants or needs them first.
Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#28Re: Ask HN: What is not going to change in future?
#29Math, physics, chemistry won't change. Who knows if software will be nearly recognizable in 10-20 years from now, but the reality of the world will not.
The whole beauty of science is that it doesn't ever claim to have static, absolute answers - it's constantly growing and changing as we learn more about everything.
Likewise, the humanities are always growing and changing and being reinterpreted, reflecting what and how we can understand now.
> Who knows if software will be nearly recognizable in 10-20 years from now
Software goes through rapid cycles of invention and forgetting what's come before. Its totem animal is a Nobel laureate goldfish. That doesn't change.