I wanted to have a scripting language that was inspired by xTalk for some light front end work alongside htmx. Didn't expect it to go anywhere.
Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
21–30 of 1001 posts
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#22Smart RSS reader that, right now, ingests about 1000 articles a day and picks out 300 for me to skim. Since I helped write this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0312018 I was always asking "Why is RSS failing? Why do failing RSS readers keep using the same failing interface that keeps failing?" and thought that text classification was ready in 2004 for content-based recommendation, then I wrote https://ontology2.com/es…
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#23I also wrote a multi-threaded backtester in C++ because the program I was using was only single-threaded. I stopped using that several years ago but the act of writing it was a lot of fun.
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#24Smart RSS reader that, right now, ingests about 1000 articles a day and picks out 300 for me to skim. Since I helped write this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0312018 I was always asking "Why is RSS failing? Why do failing RSS readers keep using the same failing interface that keeps failing?" and thought that text classification was ready in 2004 for content-based recommendation, then I wrote https://ontology2.com/es…
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#25Given two version (old and new) of a Git change (i.e., individual commit or patch series from a pull request) it produces a diff that is actually useful for reviewing purposes, assuming you've already reviewed the old version of the change.
It's sort of like `git range-diff`, but where `git range-diff` produces a "diff of diffs" that is very hard to impossible to read, this tool gives you a direct diff between old and new versions, but filters out any irrelevant changes that were introduced because the author rebased on a more recent version of the target branch.
I hope that makes sense - I never know quite how to put it into words for somebody to understand who isn't intimately familiar with Git. It is very powerful though if you combine it with a minimal amount of setup e.g. for fetching all PR branches from a GitHub repository. I use it almost daily as part of my code review workflow.
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#26once i got it to work, i left it on my desk for a few months and then cleaned it up/removed the circuit. only documented the circuit by a couple of bad photographs, so i'm not sure how to recreate it. i might could figure it out again if i spent the time, but i've been focused on other projects.
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#27Shows a nicely formatted weather report for flying my paramotor, pulling data in from many different sources :-)
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#28Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#29Never made it to prod but was a great tool for me to see where I want to budget my team's time.
This is way before all the LLM and Generator models, but it was such a fun project.
Re: Ask HN: Most interesting tech you built for just yourself?
#30There's screenshots here:
https://github.com/samsquire/liveinterface
The code is Angular 1 legacy codebase.
https://github.com/samsquire/live-interface
There's a screencast here https://github.com/samsquire/live-interface/blob/master/scre...
It's not buildable at this time due to dependencies...