Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you for sharing your recommendation, but I'm afraid that this book contains misinformation and promotes conspiracy theories that are not supported by evidence. I would kindly ask that you refrain from posting recommendations for this book in the future, as it is not in line with the standards and guidelines of HN.
Sorry for the posting and thank you for the reply. I would recommend you read this book as RFK Jr references many of the facts in this book. More and more evidence is being revealed to directly support RFK's assertions. Please send me a few of the "conspiracy theories that are not supported"? Have a pleasant day.
Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
21–30 of 256 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#22Someone Who Will Love You in All Your Damaged Glory: Stories by Raphael Bob-Waksberg is another good set of short stories, more absurd and about love, but equally fun. If you liked the funny-sad combo of Bojack Horseman (which Bob-Waksberg created), you'll probably like this.
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#23Quoted post unavailable.
Thank you for sharing your recommendation, but I'm afraid that this book contains misinformation and promotes conspiracy theories that are not supported by evidence. I would kindly ask that you refrain from posting recommendations for this book in the future, as it is not in line with the standards and guidelines of HN.
Where the hell do people get off?
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#24- Travel, Alan de Botton: This got me thinking more than anything else that I read this year - The Stars My Destination, Alfred Bester: I read a lot of scifi and fantasy, but this was the standout for the surprising (and in retrospect, obvious) twist. The other interesting aspect was that this was written in the 50s, and you can see how their idea of 'the future' is rooted in the tech of the time
Of more interest to this crowd is probably - Math Girls and Math Girls Talk About Trigonometry, Hiroshi Yuki: Brilliant!
And finally, - Lords of the Deccan, Anirudh Kanisetti: More relevant to people from the Indian Subcontinent, I suppose.
My (still to be updated) list of books I read this year: https://shrirang.karandikar.org/reading-in-2022/
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> Guns, Germs and Steel is basically a modern eugenicist theory, racist and dumb. Um, run that by me again? It’s been a while since I read it but doesn’t the book specifically argue that the Europeans conquered the Americas because of geographic factors rather than because of race? Do I have the main thrust of the book completely backwards?
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#261. https://www.amazon.com/Bringing-Up-Bébé-Discovers-Parenting/...
2. https://www.amazon.com/How-Talk-Kids-Will-Listen/dp/14516638...
3. https://www.amazon.com/Prepared-What-Kids-Need-Fulfilled/dp/...
4. https://www.amazon.com/Reviving-Ophelia-Saving-Selves-Adoles...
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> Guns, Germs and Steel is basically a modern eugenicist theory, racist and dumb. Um, run that by me again? It’s been a while since I read it but doesn’t the book specifically argue that the Europeans conquered the Americas because of geographic factors rather than because of race? Do I have the main thrust of the book completely backwards?
Like any book of its scope, there are obviously things that can be criticized ... but at least read it, and state those objections clearly.
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#28Another along similar lines of technology and war "The Arms of Krupp" William Manchester
Re: Ask HN: Best books read in 2022?
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> Guns, Germs and Steel is basically a modern eugenicist theory, racist and dumb. Um, run that by me again? It’s been a while since I read it but doesn’t the book specifically argue that the Europeans conquered the Americas because of geographic factors rather than because of race? Do I have the main thrust of the book completely backwards?