Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 289 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#21
post #7

Are you saying all of these systems enforce SMS-based 2FA rather than the sane choice of TOTP? That's unwise and unfortunate.

No, they enforce through their own crappy app which only works on few platforms.

To make things worse, if I install the app for my swiss bank on a different phone, I need to wait for snail mail to get the activation code.

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#22

But that’s kinda convinient [1]. The problem is, that there’s no real proper fallback/backup-plan. [1] not only it’s convinient, it’s also similar to what all the future predictions regarding technology said. Some small gadget or bracelet connecting over air and doing stuff.

There is a backup plan. For corporate systems, contact the IT department. For banking, call the bank or go to a branch. TOTP-based schemes can be backed up and used on multiple devices. So on and so forth.

It just so happens that most of these backup plans are incredibly inconvenient and might take a long time and effort to get through them.

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#23
Go through the whole list and figure out which of these services really requires your phone, and which you have set up on your phone because that seemed the easiest path.

Tell your workplace you're about to switch from carrying a phone to a landline: what is their fallback option? (It's about 50/50 whether they have one, but they definitely should.)

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#24
I hate it. They have been phasing out web for years in the EU.

Banks mostly but these days employers too. Getting a separate device, or multiple, seems like the least horrible options to me.

Turns out everyone wants a piece of my data I in the name of convenience. Only, it's their convenience, not mine.

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#25
post #8

All my OTPs are in Bitwarden and FreeOTP. The only thing I currently need my phone for is Google's new device login and even that goes to my tablet too.

Can you use Bitwarden for TOTP? I already use it for my passwords but for TOTP I have multiple apps and I hate it

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#26
post #2

>i can't log in to any of my banks without my phone. Don't know about banks in Europe but in USA, I can log into Bank Of America and JP Morgan Chase without any phone authentication. If I reformat my harddrive or buy a new computer and the bank doesn't recognize the web browser because no previous cookie has been found, the website will generate a one-time code and send it to my email address. I then enter that secur…

My Swedish bank offers two methods. One is the nationwide e-identification system called BankID - used for loads of commerce/governmental/identification/authentication in Sweden - which requires Internet access and works on computers as well as smartphones. The other method uses a discrete HOTP-type device (with a personalized login card) which accepts a challenge code from the bank login page and outputs a digested authentication response. As far as I know, all major banks in Sweden offer both or at least one of these two methods.

In the past a lot of banks here used OTP scratch cards, and would automatically send you a new one in the mail when you used one of the 10 last codes or so on the card.

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#27
post #3

Indeed it's incredibly stupid development. Fuck smartphones, really. I don't own one and I feel happy overall, but life is complicated because nowadays some sort of stupid app is required (most of the time, for no good reason) and dealing with those requirements always cost so much thinking. I don't want a micro-computer in my pocket, I stay at the computer all day anyway, a better one. Why can't I do with a real com…

Me too in my ideal world I wouldn't have a phone, but now I need for transport, food, financial services, nearly everything.

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#28
post #23

Go through the whole list and figure out which of these services really requires your phone, and which you have set up on your phone because that seemed the easiest path. Tell your workplace you're about to switch from carrying a phone to a landline: what is their fallback option? (It's about 50/50 whether they have one, but they definitely should.)

Why should they have a landline fallback?

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#29

I hate it. They have been phasing out web for years in the EU. Banks mostly but these days employers too. Getting a separate device, or multiple, seems like the least horrible options to me. Turns out everyone wants a piece of my data I in the name of convenience. Only, it's their convenience, not mine.

"They have been phasing out web for years in the EU."

This is such a perfect summary of the situation; thank you for formulating it so clearly. To me is insane that we are switching to a perfectly open and interoperable standard to the walled gardens of iOS and Androids.

Re: Ask HN: Why did smartphones become a single point of failure?

#30
post #28
post #23

Go through the whole list and figure out which of these services really requires your phone, and which you have set up on your phone because that seemed the easiest path. Tell your workplace you're about to switch from carrying a phone to a landline: what is their fallback option? (It's about 50/50 whether they have one, but they definitely should.)

Why should they have a landline fallback?

Because in Operations you need to cover all the scenarios, regardless of what the Developers think is the “only way” to do something.
Post reply on HN