My RSS reader service also provides an email address for email-only subscriptions: https://feedbin.com/blog/2016/02/03/subscribe-to-email-newsl... . I read email newsletters in the same place as RSS. I'm subscribed to a few low-volume Twitter searches too ( https://feedbin.com/blog/2018/01/11/feedbin-is-the-best-way-... ).
Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
21–30 of 111 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#22So in fact my inbox is usually about 90% newsletters that I haven't read yet.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#23I don't mind, although I don't get a lot of email. Maybe like 10 a day, and most of that is just receipts/invoices/confirmations which can be immediately archived. So in fact my inbox is usually about 90% newsletters that I haven't read yet.
Do you mind me asking roughly how old you are? I would like to test my theory that email is generational and it's only the over-(insert number here) that still use it as it was originally intended.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#24It gives desktop Gmail an RSS-esque topic view of your inbox, and lets you infinite scroll through emails like you would Twitter or Insta.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#25- Client-side motivation : some users want to use their email as the "universal inbox". E.g. They may also send TODOs/reminders by sending emails to themselves instead of a separate app for alarms. Newsletters are just another stream of info that should conveniently go into their universal inbox.
- Publisher-side motivation: email addresses are valuable because it's important to "build an audience" outside of centralized platforms like Patreon/Youtube/TikTok. RSS doesn't solve the same problem because that's a "pull" mechanism instead of "push" like email.
If the above factors are unimportant to a particular person, then yes, the email inbox is a suboptimal communications channel for newsletters.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#26Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#27If you do decide to go the RSS route, I use https://www.inoreader.com and haven't found a better web-based/has a phone app one yet. The others I tried were all full of nonsense AI that kept bugging me, or weird javascripty fancy UIs that broke, or just didn't let me read inline (you had to click through to pages). Other recommendations welcome though.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#28I don't mind, although I don't get a lot of email. Maybe like 10 a day, and most of that is just receipts/invoices/confirmations which can be immediately archived. So in fact my inbox is usually about 90% newsletters that I haven't read yet.
So - you don't use email for communication with actual people? Do you mind me asking roughly how old you are? I would like to test my theory that email is generational and it's only the over-(insert number here) that still use it as it was originally intended.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#29Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#30Feedly and Unread (iOS app) are my poison of choice. Lovely interface on top of a reliable service.
Unread also does an instapaper-like parse of the article if you subscribe to a feed that does that daft excerpt only thing :)