What would it take for a new social network to take users off facebook in 2017?
Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
21–30 of 444 posts
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#22Most walled gardens are built for convenience of consumption whereas most federated networks seem to assume a more active and informed participant. The kinds of features you'd build for one group are at odds with what you'd build for the other one.
Then again Brave seems to be tackling the problem from the right angle. I hope their model takes off and people start incorporating similar ideas into other open networks that respects the network participants instead of just treating them as passive consumers.
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#23Be interested in what HN thinks of Maidsafe, Storj etc. Basically decentralised versions of the internet or the cloud based around blockchain technology. Storj for example is an order of magnitude cheaper than AWS, uses peoples spare hard drive space, encrypts everything and back it up using peer to peer tech. I am currently pretty comfortable as an Android dev, but I am wondering if I should start learning everythin…
uPort: Self-Sovereign Identity (https://www.uport.me/)
Userfeeds - Content Ranking System (userfeeds.io/)
Status - Messaging Platform (https://status.im/)
Brave - Browser (https://brave.com/)
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#24Should we add github to that list?
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#25It occurs to me that all extant social media apps have, at a high level, exactly the same requirements:
1. Allow users to upload some data to cloud storage 2. Make that data discoverable to certain other users 3. Show everyone ads
Whether FB, Twitter, etc were to be dislodged by another app that is essentially the same app is not terribly interesting. So let's look at which of these reqs are amenable to change:
a. "ads" - No one actually wants them, so get rid of them b. "Cloud storage" - Lots of people would rather own their data, so switch this to "the user's own server."
That sounds pretty compelling. I don't hate FB, but I'd sure rather switch to something that allows me to own my own data, and share pics of the kids with Nana without having to run them through Facegoog's billion-dollar snooping engine. However, there are two big hurdles:
i. Most people don't have a server on which to host it ii. Most people won't pay for it, so someone would have to write it and make it really easy to use, for free
...and by a lucky cooincidence, both of those objections have the same answer: Amazon. Most people don't have a server? Amazon will rent you one. Who would develop a self-hosted FB clone for free? Amazon, to get people to rent servers.
Just a thought...
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#26Here's a thought I've been turning over for a little while now. It occurs to me that all extant social media apps have, at a high level, exactly the same requirements: 1. Allow users to upload some data to cloud storage 2. Make that data discoverable to certain other users 3. Show everyone ads Whether FB, Twitter, etc were to be dislodged by another app that is essentially the same app is not terribly interesting. So…
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#27The internet is only closed if we keep acting like it is. The protocol is the same. Go build stuff.
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#28Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#29Or would that just put the power into the hands of whoever runs the DNS system
Re: Ask HN: What are we doing about Facebook, Google, and the closed internet?
#30What would it take for a new social network to take users off facebook in 2017?
To get people off of Facebook, you'd have to find a way around that.