Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 33 posts

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#21
How? Don't serve ads.

Frequently on HN we get a lot of people who are great at building stuff but fall when it comes to finding and growing a userbase.

We then have people that are great at developing a community, have a popular niche blog or forum, and are itching to monetize their community.

Serving ads to solve this problem is like strip-mining for gold - ridiculous sediment to gold ratio.

So what if we concentrated on the affiliate model. Rather than serving ads to your community, you vet actual products and services that your community would actually use and genuinely endorse the product openly. You could run a drop-in type of "marketplace page" for your endorsements. It would be clear to your community that you receive (large) commissions on these sales, but I reason happy users would want to help your site. I'm talking 50%+ commissions so you can easily profit share in terms of offering a better price than they'd pay going directly anyway.

For product and service providers, I can't see a downside. They pay only from actual sales. The product is seen in a positive light (endorsed) rather than overlooked as an ad. And product providers could/should work closely to community moderators to iterate on their product.

As of now this seems like wishful thinking I know, but this could definitely be worked out, and provided it was dead-easy to get started from both ends, it's worth testing.

Make dropping in an affiliate marketplace easy for content providers. And make revenue sharing, management, and tracking easy for product providers. Develop community around connecting the two in a vetted environment. Profit off transaction fees.

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#22
I think one secret is community-based ads. I'm happy to receive ads about products directly related to sites I frequent. For example, things produced by YC... I would be happy to peruse an "ads" tab (next to "jobs"/"submit") by my own volition. 2600 magazine does the same thing... ads by subscribers only... and they're always interesting. That's the key. Find ads that people WANT to see, so much that they're almost willing to go out of their way to see.

Then again, if you really have high enough volume, why can't you just try EVERYTHING and then only show ads that get high CTR? Isn't 5k impressions a sufficient sample size?

What about using graphs of campaign clickthru rates for individual people (a la directededge)?

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#23
For every youtube video, i should see ads on when the artist is next coming to town by me. Find out where i live by simple ip address geolocation. Get commissions on ticket sales. If the artist isnt coming soon use the panoply of recommendation systems to just find out when similar artists are comin instead

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#24
post #12

Imitate The Deck ( http://decknetwork.net/ ). They produce beautiful, low impact, relevant ads which I frequently consider carefully and often click-through on. They do an amazing job and I've deliberately reduced the power of my adblock blacklists to see those ads. An example ad: http://hivelogic.com/ They're clearly not even attempting to scale, but they have the ideas that -- if brought to scale -- could make adve…

I look forward to using them for GridSpy. Thanks for the recommendation.

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#25
post #21

How? Don't serve ads. Frequently on HN we get a lot of people who are great at building stuff but fall when it comes to finding and growing a userbase. We then have people that are great at developing a community, have a popular niche blog or forum, and are itching to monetize their community. Serving ads to solve this problem is like strip-mining for gold - ridiculous sediment to gold ratio. So what if we concentrat…

I think you're really onto something. The whole "ads suck" conversation is kind of unnecessary because there are so many ways to make money on advertizing without annoying anybody. Dan Kennedy's books are essentially just giant, 200-page ads, and I buy them and read them cover-to-cover (and overnight in most cases).

Cluetrain Manifesto explained it more than a decade ago: markets are conversations. The flipside to that: conversations are markets. So if you're filling the whole world with conversational media, you're turning everything into a market.

However:

Make dropping in an affiliate marketplace easy for content providers. And make revenue sharing, management, and tracking easy for product providers.

This already exists. :-) Both through the reputable world of Amazon (et al) and the disreputable (or less-reputable) world of Clickbank (et al), this is all a done deal and already was a done deal several years ago. The tech is simple: cookies and HTTP redirects.

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#26
I like the 125x125 image ad format. It's just big enough to get my attention, and small enough so the publisher can stack in a few of them without taking up too much space. I think it's been gaining a lot of popularity lately for those who sell adspace directly to businesses.

A few examples that come to mind

http://betterexplained.com/

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/coffee (bottom of the page)

http://37signals.com/svn/

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#27
post #2

Doing targeted advertising that is utility is the best way to make ads not suck. The main reason advertising is annoying is because we are looking for something else, we don't need it right now, or its the wrong audience. If you had a huge spare tire and wanted rock hard abs, and the advertisement could prove the safety of your purchase, you would say "HELL YEAH!" When I was 16 the advertisement for Proactiv was very…

Yup, that's a feeling I have too. One thought is: how can you involve your community more to decide which ads are useful and get feedback?

If these are lead generating ads, you could determine if a click lead to a sale. If you had this data (which was pointed out by the OP about tracking every click - although he insinuated its bad), you could determine what types of ads work and which ones don't.

So this is two fold, you remove the ads that don't work (so you don't annoy your audience), which in turn creates a more potent advertising experience for vendors which makes that real estate more attractive.

The trick is not letting every dog through the door and keeping some class.

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#28

1) Advertise real products or services. Seems like 3/4 of the ads I see on facebook are scams or vapor. Carefully vet your advertisers to make sure they're legit. 2) Make ads relevant. I'm a happily married stay-at-home dad. I'm not interested in dating ads, but ads for better bottles could get my attention. Keyword-driven or site-demographic-driven ads are a start. As dpcan suggested, browsers could allow us to tag…

Item 4 makes item 2 harder to achieve - less relevance per unit of effort.

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#29
> How can we make ads not suck?

If there was some kind of nonprofit "respectful advertising alliance" that enforced consumer-friendly practices and provided a whitelist to import into adblock plus, I might use it. It would be hard to define what is consumer friendly and enforce the rules, though.

The only site I've disable adblock on is Reddit. This is because their ads use inside jokes and are sometimes humorous and always non-intrusive.

I don't see what is so nice about Google ads. They look crappy on most sites and are rarely useful in my experience. Also not a fan of Google's tracking with adwords.

Re: Ask HN: How Can Ads Not Suck?

#30
Try a classifieds model where content providers don't place any advertising on their pages at all. They then put a "Classifieds" link on desired pages, that takes you to another page filled with targeted advertising relevant to the article or site as a whole. As a bonus, let the content providers have an opportunity to select or vote on ads to reward quality and improve relevancy. The classifieds page doesn't even need to come from the referring site, as it is completely separate from the content. If advertising is so wonderful, this model can't fail. It's less intrusive and encourages the advertising industry to provide something of value.
Post reply on HN