Earlier quoted context omitted.
It all depends if you care about the tech side of HN or the startup side of HN. I love the tech articles above all else and could easily do without the general trend fluff. With that said, I don’t find the AI posts nearly as bad as the Blockchain era.
As annoyed as I am with the constant deluge of uninteresting AI/LLM articles, I would much rather see a split between tech and startup news. I think that's a lasting and useful distinction.
Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
191–200 of 401 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#192Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#193Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#194Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#195Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Folks really do come to HN to read the articles and then maybe get drawn into a discussion. based on the number of comments i see that are oblivious to the actual content of the articles, i'm pretty sure the user flow is "Folks come to HN to read headlines and have a conversation, and then maybe get drawn into reading an article"
Those comments can't reflect people who are drawn in by the article but don't engage. Upvotes hint it is a significant number. Past that, I don't see non-reading commenters being a dominant presence. Some topics draw a few more than normal but that's the worst of it.
Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#197Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#198People who are a little late to the site may not know there was a time on HN where Erlang has even more frontage submission than the best of AI / LLM. Ruby Rails, Postgres, SQLite, Rust, etc. They all have their moments and I dont think LLM right now is as overwhelming as any other hyped moments. Certainly not Erlang.
I'm not fighting for a split/fork, just stating the fact that it's nothing compared to Erlang.
Re: Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything else/other?"
#199People who are a little late to the site may not know there was a time on HN where Erlang has even more frontage submission than the best of AI / LLM. Ruby Rails, Postgres, SQLite, Rust, etc. They all have their moments and I dont think LLM right now is as overwhelming as any other hyped moments. Certainly not Erlang.
I wouldn't mind the Erlang-dominated front page coming back :)