Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

news.ycombinator.com

191–199 of 199 posts

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#191
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep, resellers of dedicated machines rent servers in bulk so you can often get boxes for way cheaper than you would directly from the host. Take a look at https://hostingby.design as an example.

I've been using a HostingBy.Design seedbox (formerly Seedbox.io) for years to distribute content to my patrons for 3 years. They have excellent uptime and their customer service is knowledgeable.

Looks like they are just a reseller of Hetzner and Leaseweb?

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#192
post #149
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for finding this. Unlimited rarely is. Looks like backblaze (other post below) has a free bandwidth and cheap storage solution

Backblaze B2 is only free with Bandwidth Alliance partners, otherwise $0.01/GB, individual transactions will also cost you, depending on how much you use.

Individual transaction pricing: https://www.backblaze.com/b2/cloud-storage-pricing.html#

Bandwidth Alliance introduced me to bunny.net, interesting find.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#193
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Been looking at hetzner for their arm cloud offering. But I can’t figure out if instances upgraded or do you need to terminate and rebuild. support seems non existent cos no one answers emails or web chat…

You can rescale cloud servers at hetzner, but you will need to shutdown the server in the process

That’s ok. As long as I don’t need to set it up again.

Thank you!

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#194
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI, video files (and potentially anything not text/HTML) is prohibited through Cloudlare in their TOS (some services like r2 excluded)

They have updated their TOS a few days ago: https://blog.cloudflare.com/updated-tos/ The prohibition on non-HTML content seems to only apply to CDN usage now.

AFAIK Serving content from Backblaze via CloudFlare is exactly CDN Usage

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#195
OVH is probably your best bet and should be the cheapest both for hosting and serving the files. You'd be hard pressed to beat the value there without buying your own servers and colocating in eastern Europe.

Most of their storage servers have 1gbps unmetered public bandwidth options and that should be sufficient to serve ~4TB per day, reliably.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#196
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI, video files (and potentially anything not text/HTML) is prohibited through Cloudlare in their TOS (some services like r2 excluded)

They have updated their TOS a few days ago: https://blog.cloudflare.com/updated-tos/ The prohibition on non-HTML content seems to only apply to CDN usage now.

That is exactly the use case, which is hosting the files on b2 (not cdn capable) and caching+serving from cloudflare. Unless the files in question are webpages or static webpage content (doubtful) then it would definitely be exactly the target of these new TOS updates.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#197
Hell, make me a fair offer and I'll throw it up on ye olde garage cluster. That thing has battery backup, a dedicated 5 Gbps pipe, and about 40 TB free space on Ceph. I'll even toss in free incident response if your URL fails to resolve. But it'll probably be your fault, cause I haven't needed a maintenance window on that thing in like three years.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#198
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> even if you factor in the cost of your time you should come out ahead There is always the hidden cost of not spending time on activities that are core to your business (if this is indeed for a business) that would make multiples of the money CF costs you.

There is more and more that can be done like proxmox to help make self hosted as much as an appliance as anything else.

That, and also NixOS - I’m discovering it for myself now, and it’s been a revelation! Configuring absolutely everything declaratively from scratch, even the disk partitions - a dream for reproducibility. It even has configurable “micro-VMs”, which would not be as easy to do via Proxmox (not counting LXC), since they would have to be built manually. Though Proxmox does have some nice benefits over it as well, especially considering their ecosystem with PBS, mail server etc

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#199
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is more and more that can be done like proxmox to help make self hosted as much as an appliance as anything else.

That, and also NixOS - I’m discovering it for myself now, and it’s been a revelation! Configuring absolutely everything declaratively from scratch, even the disk partitions - a dream for reproducibility. It even has configurable “micro-VMs”, which would not be as easy to do via Proxmox (not counting LXC), since they would have to be built manually. Though Proxmox does have some nice benefits over it as well, especial…

Thanks for the intro to NixOS. I was trying to remember one I had seen & forgotten and I think this may have been it.

I have been playing more and more with UTM in the Mac world and it's encouraging how mature it seems already and hopefully can be picked up into NixOS, Sandstorm, etc.

I like proxmox more personally, however have changed my stance recently where nix and sandstorm could just be run in a proxmox vm and then provide more of an IaaS role. The newer versions of ProxMox are even easier and they were pretty OK the past 5-7 years.

Post reply on HN