Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

news.ycombinator.com

191–200 of 208 posts

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#191
post #131

Honestly, despite the UX changes, Reddit has stayed remarkably consistent over the past decade or so I've used it. Big, generic subreddits are trash and always have been, but small, focused subreddits are great. Reddit is still hands down the best place on the internet for product recommendations, candid product reviews, niche hobbies, and discussions about TV shows, movies, and games. Edit - to prove my point furthe…

>small, focused subreddits are great. No, not in my experience. Not compared to small focused forums on any moderately complex or interesting topic anyway. The whole format is designed for quick throwaway content and not for having long nuanced discussions and so the subreddit will be oriented towards just that. Worse still I think it might even poison the brains of the Redditors into thinking that the subreddit is a…

I fully agree with this. People constantly claim small subreddits are still okay in defence of reddit, but my question is: where are those subreddits?

My experience on reddit has been universally negative regardless of community size. The site's very design discourages quality content.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#192

Anybody looking for a platform that resembles old Reddit should check out Lemmy https://lemmy.ml/

This doesn't resemble old reddit to me. Old reddit was the wild west with competing mini fiefdoms. This website appears to be heavily curated by its operators.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#193
post #144

Mods. Whenever you see community/forums take the wrong turn - it's always mods. Reddit is now extremely leftwing, to the point of pushing communism and banning everyone with even slightest conservative view-points, and that's where mods come in - mods can ban account for life sitewide. This was the first mistake Second mistake was banning and removing subs that were controversial and might or might not have been frow…

I'd argue mods as well. My account was OG and in a local subreddit after a local incident occurred, I suggested that the issue had made me reconsider my views on a subject. Pretty innocent. The mods banned me from the sub, when I replied why and gave a couple of paragraphs about how it's my local area and it would be quite upsetting to be banned over a non-offensive view, they responded with "F$£D OFF" and then my ac…

lastitude's comment below is flagged (probably because of the source), but it was an important and newsworthy event that adds to your point.

The people who moderate the website aren't capable of behaving impartially. The admins who are supposed to moderate the platform are selected from that group. The result is unsurprising.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#194
post #190
post #163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has become incredibly political. It always has had a heavy political aspect, but now it's just about completely impossible to avoid.

Even a subreddit like /r/nba has become super political. Literally impossible.

Even r/Lego went through a phase where minifigures mocking prominent Republicans and Donald Trump were posted. It has since quieted down but the mods took an obviously hands-off approach and it was likely they agreed with the message and had no qualms about the divisive content.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No election campaigns either, they are all dictators-for-life unless reddit head office decides they need to be involved. This is the same issue IRC has. In the old days, if you were lucky, sometimes you could unseat a tyrant, but modern IRC channel ownership is enforced by the server itself. This is part of why I like Twitter, even though I haven't been active on it in some time. People have to opt-in to you on Twit…

> People have to opt-in to you on Twitter. It's impossible to be a tyrant on Twitter, you cannot compel people to pay attention to you there. You can't "compel people to pay attention to you" on Reddit (or HN, Facebook, etc) either Mute/block/ban exists on pretty much every social media platform (with the possible exception of HN (at least - I've never seen it hereon))

The way reddit implemented the block is very interesting also.

If you wish to control a conversation in some sort of strange manner, all you need to do is state something outrageous and plainly wrong, and then block the other person arguing with you. It makes you look like you got the last word because they can't respond and your comment stays up.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#196
I actually found the old reddit (pre-2016 or so) hard to use and full of even more useless content than it is today. I personally don't understand how people continue to use the "old" reddit interface.

I spend a lot of time reading incredibly engaging and useful content on reddit (web/official app) these days.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UX redesign is also clearly part of a mobile-first strategy. The mobile site funnels users into the mobile app, and the desktop site clearly echos the mobile design principles. Mobile users fundamentally engage with the platform in different ways. For one, they form a different demographic segment than older users, and secondly the mobile app frames and filters content in uniquely mobile ways. High-signal content…

> The mobile site funnels users into the mobile app, and the desktop site clearly echos the mobile design principles. More like hoards them into the app with a cattle prod. You can't use the mobile site without constantly confirming that no, I really really really don't want to use the app like I said 20 seconds ago. This is beyond dark patterns. It's pure user hostility.

Go to settings -> ask to open in app to disable this

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#198

Unfortunately I think it's a combination of popularity and exposing what happens in upvoted systems as opposed to discussion forums; the lowest common denominator rules. "Both sides" fallacies, typically having a political meaning, are naturally going to get exploited on social media sites where both sides upvote the poorly baked, emotionally charged fallacies. It is alarming to me as a statnerd that the NBA and NFL…

>It is alarming to me as a statnerd that the NBA and NFL communities seem to be getting dumber as time goes on

In addition to what sunspark said, I've heard that the average /r/nba person doesn't actually watch games, and only participates for the memes.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> People have to opt-in to you on Twitter. It's impossible to be a tyrant on Twitter, you cannot compel people to pay attention to you there. You can't "compel people to pay attention to you" on Reddit (or HN, Facebook, etc) either Mute/block/ban exists on pretty much every social media platform (with the possible exception of HN (at least - I've never seen it hereon))

The way reddit implemented the block is very interesting also. If you wish to control a conversation in some sort of strange manner, all you need to do is state something outrageous and plainly wrong, and then block the other person arguing with you. It makes you look like you got the last word because they can't respond and your comment stays up.

It's kinda similar to Facebook - I block Joe Schmoe, but people who haven't blocked him (or me) can still see whatever it is he wrote

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to Reddit?

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Better to ignore their current mobile site and use the old layout, which is inexplicably still available at https://i.reddit.com/ with a much better experience.

And here I have been using https://old.reddit.com on a mobile device like a barbarian. Thank you for posting this!

Same here! Thank you!
Post reply on HN