Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

news.ycombinator.com

191–200 of 258 posts

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#191
If you don't _want_ to get a PhD, it will be very hard to finish. It is already hard if you are motivated and eager to do research.

Also, just the title alone is of not much value in industry, you need to have done research in a sought-after area. So if you mainly want to do it for career purposes, interactive theorem proving is probably not a good choice. If you think you need a PhD to get interesting industry jobs, better look for a PhD in an area where FAANG researchers publish.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#192
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Ghosted by companies for jobs directly related to my research This is unexpected. What's going on there?

I have heard it anecdotally time and time again, "Overqualified". Specialization only pays more when there's demand for the exact specialization. Nobody wants to pay a PhD and risk them moving onto the "perfect" position when the same job can be done by somebody more generalized.

Couldn't OP just not list that on the resume/application? This seems like a solvable problem if it's as bad as they make it out.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This will sound rude and I’m sorry but there is no way your entire life is ruined because you decided to get a PhD from one of the top 5 most prestigious institutions in the entire world.

I totally believe it. Debt sucks. Being smart (passed a certain point) sucks. Plus, think of the lock-in, losing friends, etc. Basically, he sold his soul, and I don't blame him for thinking he's not going to get it back.

There's typically no debt doing a STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering and Math) Ph.D. in most places, unless you're talking about undergrad debt.

STEM Ph.D.s are like jobs. You get paid a stipend (the financial package typically requires you to work as a TA/RA).

A few data points. My Ph.D. program paid me $30k/yr tax free over 4 years. Prestige scholarship holders were able to get even more, maybe $45k-50k. (my numbers are old -- I got my Ph.D. nearly a decade ago)

I've had friends at Princeton who received packages in the range of $28k-$35k/yr from their engineering depts.

Not a huge amount of money, but enough for a single grad student to survive on. I have a friend who did a Ph.D. in Math at Stanford, and he didn't have to pay cent.

Debt is generally not a common issue for STEM Ph.Ds.

Humanities/Social Science Ph.Ds. on the other hand are a completely different ball game. I've heard that many live in relative penury and rarely finish on-time (taking anywhere from 5-7 years). Humanities Ph.Ds. please add data points.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#194
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tend to disagree with this. PhD's tend to work in advanced areas of companies. When recessions hit, R&D is one of the first places to take a hit.

I think the idea is that you spend the recession years in a relatively safe albeit badly paid position which can potentially lead to more lucrative opportunities in the post-recession years. This makes some sense except that your skill in predicting recessions is likely horrible and you probably shouldn't be planning your career based on it.

Some years ago I remember somebody (maybe Tim Bray) had a post that the people who had the best careers in Tech would go to secure government positions during recessions, where they would generally work on crafting the standards other people would have to follow, after the recession they would move into a period of private consulting on the standards they had just designed. I think the PhD argument is a variant of that.

It is of course correct that if you are so good at predicting recessions that you could use this strategy effectively then probably your best monetizing possibility would be just predicting recessions and investing based on that. But then it is not sure that people will do the most effective thing either.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#195

> I'm afraid I won't be able to find interesting work with just a MSc, and I'm really afraid of getting a boring software engineering gig. This is probably true. Most jobs you'll get with a BS+Msc are going to be app development. Web, mobile, server... pick your flavor. You'll largely be using tools developed by other people, to build applications. The really interesting jobs are absolutely held by Phds. But that's n…

> The really interesting jobs are absolutely held by Phds.

That wholly depends on your definition of interesting.

I don't have a PhD.

I've written software that taught literacy to kids, helped people pay their bills online (back in 1999, when this was novel), written full ML systems (15 years ago, before the advent of open source ml packages), co-founded a YC company, and now I'm helping people rediscover the images of their lives (see my profile if you're interested!)

To be sure, I'd love to go back to school. There's so much I know I don't know, and would be wonderful to discover.

Just realize you can work on interesting stuff if you look for it, are willing to stretch your skills continuously, and change jobs every handful of years.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#196
Hey everyone,

I just wanted to say thanks for all your insightful and helpful comments. A big, wide range of opinions are represented and it gave me a lot of needed perspective.

I'm still thinking carefully about my options/future and haven't come to a definite decision yet--but I wanted to give a big thanks to everyone who contributed. Thanks again.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you on the point that money is overemphasized, but does a PhD really mean you're more likely to add great value to history and humankind?

Yes, that is basically the job description; the point of a PhD is to contribute new knowledge.

But in fact most often old topics are revisited with slightly different approaches.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#199

I have a Ph.D. in CS from the University of Washington. I'm glad I did it, but it's not for most people. Academic research is like a marathon and the Ph.D. is like a marathon training program. If you don't want to run a marathon, you probably don't need a marathon training program. Yes, a marathon training program is an interesting and rewarding way to improve your running, but it's very likely you can find equally i…

I almost have a PhD from UW and concur. One failure mode I’ve observed in people getting a PhD is not fully understanding what it entails before starting. Later they undergo a painful period of rectifying reality and their idealized version of what it means to be a PhD student. Often realizing it wasn’t for them, and they would be happier elsewhere. I think for many people it’s important to overcome the sunk cost fallacy and leave.

Like many things in life a PhD is what you make of it, and I know many people who have had a miserable time, and those who’ve had an awesome time and everything in between. My PhD has been exceptionally tough, and not for the reasons Philip talks about, I have an awesome advisor, great lab, focus, lots of papers and it’s still just a challenging process. To me the PhD is much like ultra-marathon training, I’ve had the opportunity to do amazing things that I would have never got to do at a company for 5 or 6 years and wrote cool papers and built high impact systems. Though I’ve had to do all those things while making almost no money, and working with exceptionally limited resources.

Re: Ask HN: Will getting a PhD lead to a more interesting life?

#200
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I totally believe it. Debt sucks. Being smart (passed a certain point) sucks. Plus, think of the lock-in, losing friends, etc. Basically, he sold his soul, and I don't blame him for thinking he's not going to get it back.

There's typically no debt doing a STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering and Math) Ph.D. in most places, unless you're talking about undergrad debt. STEM Ph.D.s are like jobs. You get paid a stipend (the financial package typically requires you to work as a TA/RA). A few data points. My Ph.D. program paid me $30k/yr tax free over 4 years. Prestige scholarship holders were able to get even more, maybe $45k-50k. (my numbers…

It is still pretty much the same, the UW stipend in Seattle is enough to rent an apartment in a nice neighborhood and eat well. Not an extravagant life but no one is going even 20k into debt, let alone 50,100,200k that people do for other professional paths.

I know Stanford PhDs have even higher stipends to offset the costs of Palo Alto.

Post reply on HN