Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

news.ycombinator.com

181–190 of 221 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#181
post #7

London is great. So are many other large and diverse multinational cities. Many of them also happen to be great for in-office tech job opportunities.

Isn’t weather too gloomy? It’s very difficult for people who can’t thrive in non-sunny often weather.

It's true that daylight is limited in the winter months but I really like the weather in London because it doesn't get extremely hot in the summer or extremely cold and snowy in the winter.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#182

New York * most diverse and cosmopolitan English-speaking and relatively-free city in the world, by far * compact with good public transit, creating an incredibly high points of interest per commute hour ratio - the best metric for measuring urban qol * not the BEST tech/entrepreneurial communities, but still has very good ones, and is better rounded than the very top tier tech hubs: high quality art, design, games,…

All very true. The one thing that worn on me about NYC: most people leave after 5-7 years. If you stay longer than that, everyone you built relationships with early on will be gone and the ones from the middle will be planning their departure. You can keep meeting new people to fill up the leaky boat, but gradually as you get older, you lose access to the spaces where all these new, exciting (mostly young) people meet each other.

I love it for so many reasons, but that one aspect does wear on me.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#183

If I can work from anywhere in the world, why in all flying hells would I work from a city?

For me personally, quality of life. No need for a car, I love theatre and as a kid I had to commute two hours to get to the next chess club because I lived in the middle of nowhere.

College towns. Easier to go to the theater than in the city, and most interesting stuff comes through town eventually. When I lived in SFBA, I went to a show every month or so. In Hanover NH pre-pandemic, it was once a week. And less need for a car, except in winter snowstorms.

Enough good restaurants to not be boring, two hours to Boston, two and a half to Montreal (by car) and NYC (by air) for easy weekend trips if you need a big city fix.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#185

Where I am now, nearish to central Vancouver. I'd love to live in other places for some time for other reasons, but they're all cities in Europe with different ages and cultures. Smaller places are great to visit, but are boring and lack breadth of novelty. It takes me 4 mins to walk to the gym where I bump into people I'm gradually getting to know, then 2 mins to the next cafe where I might get to know someone, then…

wow really? I'm currently in Richmond and i've finding the housing issue here so out of hand that it's depressing... Even with FAANG salary my friends are finding it tough to afford a decently sized home :l

If you have enough means to consider the concept of home ownership, you have different issues than me, but you're not the first to consider leaving for that reason. I like my neighborhood a lot and would be sad to leave it. Have lived in other areas though that I wasn't so attached to.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#186

If I had to choose one, it'd be Stockholm (or perhaps any Swedish city with water access). A couple years back I did take a two-week trip there consisting of one week sightseeing, one week remotely working for a West Coast agency. My work hours were around 4pm to 1am-2am Stockholm time, which was just on the edge of comfortable. My reasoning is as follows: 1) Fast internet everywhere I went, even the countryside 2) G…

An erstwhile Londoner here who now lives in Stockholm. Technically I'm Swedish having been granted citizenship this year - another plus, it's relatively easy to get residence and citizenship is mostly a matter of waiting.

I've been here for a few years and would agree with most of your points. I absolutely love it. Boat trips into the archipelago in the summer months are the icing on the cake of an amazing place to live.

As for the language thing - you can (and lots do) live here without learning Swedish. There are also various intensive courses (e.g. at Folkuniversitetet) that will get you up to a dull-conversational level quite quickly.

As an ex-Londoner, the house prices seem very reasonable - we've just moved into a 3 bedroom apartment in the suburbs with a view of the lake and adjacent to a nature reserve. In London the same money might have bought us a pokey 1 or 2 bedroom flat.

London had more arts and so on, and I miss the English language theatre stuff, but in general it's just an amazing place to live. Now, you must excuse me, we're off to see Candide at Kunliga Operan :P

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How? Its not diverse at all compared to a city like London. Unless you are a German/looks likes one it's a poor city to be in.

Berlin has all the benefits and little to none of the disadvantages of a place like London. Why does a place need to be diverse to be great? Does the absence of a heap of Mincéirs make a city worse?

Well your reply pretty much back my point.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#188
In an ideal world, these are in no order:

* Safe

* Affordable

* Great weather with no extremes (snow, storms, heatwaves)

* Close to the sea with beaches and piers for walking

* Not overcrowded

* Great public transport

* Close to mountains for hikes

* Good pubs and restaurants with lots of variety

* Good looking women

* Good internet

If anyone has any suggestions please say! I don't think a place like this exists.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#189
post #14

Somewhere in the middle of nowhere. I currently live in a small town in the mountains. Love the mountain aspect of it. The townspeople are progressive in some ways (they try to be 'woke'), but extremely regressive when it comes to development (NIMBYism on steroids). Housing is a major problem, all the restaurants are shit, nothing gets built pretty much ever, most of the tax burden is on the few businesses there are,…

Off topic but [maybe] relevant... > Somewhere in the middle of nowhere. A part of me too desires this. For a software engineer, what you need most is good network connectivity, which is now possible in many places. The other part of me is convinced that would not be a good move in the long run. If I move away from the city, my kids' education will suffer, my mother (who also lives with me) will lose the social connec…

The only problem for something too remote for me is my kids. They are still young but I'd like to make sure they have local opportunities to meet other kids, get experience at local employers, and have good schools.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#190

In an ideal world, these are in no order: * Safe * Affordable * Great weather with no extremes (snow, storms, heatwaves) * Close to the sea with beaches and piers for walking * Not overcrowded * Great public transport * Close to mountains for hikes * Good pubs and restaurants with lots of variety * Good looking women * Good internet If anyone has any suggestions please say! I don't think a place like this exists.

I'm not keen to start a discussion here, but your wish for 'good looking women' looks a bit out of place next to affordable living cost, public transportation, etc. Might say more about you than you like.
Post reply on HN