Halmos & Rudin.
Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
181–190 of 219 posts
Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hate that the default attitude of our society about people with religious beliefs necessitates your disclaimer.
What attitude can you expect from rationalists towards those who decide to believe in claims without requiring evidence or justification? The moral high ground which you seem to think exists for you, does not.
Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#183Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#184Brewer, Ebenezer Cobham. Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable
Euclid, Elements of Geometry
Fuller, Buckminster. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth
Greene, Robert. The 48 Laws of Power
Kernighan & Ritchie. The C Programming Language
The King James Bible
Polya, George. How to Solve It
Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#185Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#186I have nothing programming related on my desk; we have Google to thanks for that.
Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#187I use CLRS and the 2600 book as monitor risers. More seriously, I generally don't re-read books. One exception is The Cuckoo's Egg, which I reread every ~5 years.
The only negative is the biscuit recipe isn't very good.
Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#188Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#189A few Stroustrup books. A few Chinese language books (to help communicate with co-workers) A few Algorithmic Trading related books as well as a few math books. And, laugh if you wish, a few Buddhism books to help remind myself patience, no negative energy, etc. If I am feeling frustrated I can read a few quick thoughts.
Not laughing at the Buddhism books. That's actually a great suggestion!
Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hate that the default attitude of our society about people with religious beliefs necessitates your disclaimer.
What attitude can you expect from rationalists towards those who decide to believe in claims without requiring evidence or justification? The moral high ground which you seem to think exists for you, does not.