Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?

news.ycombinator.com

181–190 of 219 posts

Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate that the default attitude of our society about people with religious beliefs necessitates your disclaimer.

What attitude can you expect from rationalists towards those who decide to believe in claims without requiring evidence or justification? The moral high ground which you seem to think exists for you, does not.

I think the world would be a better place without cunts like you.

Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?

#184
Adams, Douglas. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Brewer, Ebenezer Cobham. Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable

Euclid, Elements of Geometry

Fuller, Buckminster. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth

Greene, Robert. The 48 Laws of Power

Kernighan & Ritchie. The C Programming Language

The King James Bible

Polya, George. How to Solve It

Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?

#187

I use CLRS and the 2600 book as monitor risers. More seriously, I generally don't re-read books. One exception is The Cuckoo's Egg, which I reread every ~5 years.

The Cuckoo's Egg is such a good read, at the time it came out there was a television program in the UK about it and I have been rereading the book every couple of years since watching that.

The only negative is the biscuit recipe isn't very good.

Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?

#189
post #20

A few Stroustrup books. A few Chinese language books (to help communicate with co-workers) A few Algorithmic Trading related books as well as a few math books. And, laugh if you wish, a few Buddhism books to help remind myself patience, no negative energy, etc. If I am feeling frustrated I can read a few quick thoughts.

Not laughing at the Buddhism books. That's actually a great suggestion!

Me neither. Nothing like a saucy koan to snap me out of an infinite stoopid-loop.

Re: Ask HN: What books do you keep on your desk?

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate that the default attitude of our society about people with religious beliefs necessitates your disclaimer.

What attitude can you expect from rationalists towards those who decide to believe in claims without requiring evidence or justification? The moral high ground which you seem to think exists for you, does not.

That which works is sufficient evidence unto itself. The whole idea that what is beyond the capabilities of reason doesn't exist is laughable, except when it becomes inhuman.
Post reply on HN