Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

news.ycombinator.com

171–180 of 211 posts

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#171
"Energy, the Subtle Concept", a great overview of the history and physics of energy that doesn't avoid equations: http://www.amazon.com/Energy-Subtle-Concept-discovery-Feynma...

"The Four Steps to the Epiphany" needs no introduction. The first couple of chapters really drove home some mistakes I have made in past projects.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#172
post #49

The Alchemist Heard about it for years, always wrote off as too esoteric but as an entrepreneur it seriously resonated and somehow made it all seem a little more manageable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Alchemist_(novel)

Fantastic book. Either that, or Eliezer Yudkowsky's fanfiction "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality" was the best fiction I read this year. http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1/Harry_Potter_and_the_M... HP&TMOR didn't sound like the kind of thing I'd have liked... massively mistaken. Very good. Highly recommended.

I don't see the point of having a no procrastination setting on Hackernews if irresponsible people link to captivating etexts like Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.

That's book is really grabbing me at the moment.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#173

"The Four Steps To The Epiphany" - Steve Blank. Because it opened my eyes to a whole new world in terms of understanding customer development and the "market definition" side of things. And, coming from a background as a hacker, not a sales/biz-dev guy, that's exactly what I needed.

I agree, but I really wish that Steve would invest in a book designer. It's truly one of the most ugly books I've ever seen. But to be fair it is actually the minimum viable product.

I agree. I had the book on my shelves for a year before I finally started reading it, because it looks so amateurish.

It's absolutely riddled with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, but it's still one of my favourite books of the year for the content.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#174
post #161

The eight books of the House of Niccolo series by Dorothy Dunnett. Swashbuckling 15th-century entrepreneurship. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_House_of_Niccol%C3%B2 And once you've finished that, there's a sequel series (actually written before the House of Niccolo): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymond_Chronicles

The first of the Lymond Chronicles, Game of Kings, is in the running for best (fiction) book I've read, never mind best fiction I've read this year.

However, yes, entrepreneurs in particular will love Niccolo.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#175
post #49

The Alchemist Heard about it for years, always wrote off as too esoteric but as an entrepreneur it seriously resonated and somehow made it all seem a little more manageable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Alchemist_(novel)

I hated this book. It was like a kitschy, easy digestable, consumer friendly version of other (much) better south american writers.

It was like a Borghes book told by the author of Harry Potter.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fantastic book. Either that, or Eliezer Yudkowsky's fanfiction "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality" was the best fiction I read this year. http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1/Harry_Potter_and_the_M... HP&TMOR didn't sound like the kind of thing I'd have liked... massively mistaken. Very good. Highly recommended.

I don't see the point of having a no procrastination setting on Hackernews if irresponsible people link to captivating etexts like Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality. That's book is really grabbing me at the moment.

> I don't see the point of having a no procrastination setting on Hackernews if irresponsible people link to captivating etexts like Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.

There goes the next two weeks of your free time.

Sorry.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#177
The Ridiculous Race Steve Hely & Vali Chandrasekaran http://www.amazon.com/Ridiculous-Race-Steve-Hely/dp/08050874...

Two friends challenge each other to an old fashioned race around the world with one caveat: no airplanes. Starting from the first page hilarity ensues as the two try to outdo, outthink and out race while experiencing as much as they can at the same time.

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah - I think that was the intention of the author. I used to work in AI research so I'm probably being a bit harsh.

mind sharing why you no longer work in ai research

It's a long time ago now (late 80s early 90s), but reasons include:

- I hated the politics/game-playing that seem to be a huge component of getting on in academic research

- It was clear to me that we are unlikely to see any fundamental breakthroughs in general AI during my career

- I had been doing work on the Web since '92 and it was clear to me by '95 that this had a much brighter future than "classical" AI

- I co-founded a Web/Java startup in '95

Re: Ask HN: Best book you read in 2010 and briefly why

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I came to a similar realization but unfortunately not until 5 or so books into the Wheel of Time series. I think I found myself reading a 10+ page section in which several women were doing their hair and gossiping about the men in their lives and realized (based on that scene plus some other trends I started seeing in previous books) that the series had jumped the shark and the author was now just trying to pump up t…

You might look back into the WoT. Since Jordan's death, Brandon Sanderson has been finishing up the series, and (IMO) the latest books have returned to a level of quality rivaling the first three.

agreed, although to note -- the last 3 are likely much better because their plot is so much more set in stone. the middle books meandered because RJ did so much in the first 3 books that he realized he had to let the plot catch up to the action in order to do what he wanted to do with the story.
Post reply on HN