No, I find it unwilling to produce factual information. For example Jeep consistently lands at the bottom of the reliability ratings. Try asking GPT if Jeeps are reliable. The response reads like Jeep advertising.
LLMs are like humans. They don't know what you mean, only what you say. They can't tell you what you want to know, they can only answer the question you actually ask! The question you asked is broad and phrased in a way that begs a simplistic answer about the entire brand . Obviously an answer to that question will do a worse job of laying out the relative reliability of current jeep models than would a report which…
Actually, you hit the nail on the head, they are _not_ like humans because they only know what you say, not what you mean. A human would understand that when you ask a broad question, you want a broad answer. Broadly speaking, Jeeps are bad.
Our current LLM are kneecapped because they are very reluctant to be negative.