Recently (last few months) I've been testing HD Fury VRRoom, and am happy with it, as it allows switching instantly regardless of monitor, by having negotiation already set up: https://hdfury.com/product/8k-vrroom-40gbps/ It maintains a live connection to each of 4 x HDMI inputs, 2 x HDMI outputs (mirrored or matrixed), and 1 x eARC audio output, and can switch between them "instantly" as you ask. You can switch with…
Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
161–170 of 185 posts
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#162Recently (last few months) I've been testing HD Fury VRRoom, and am happy with it, as it allows switching instantly regardless of monitor, by having negotiation already set up: https://hdfury.com/product/8k-vrroom-40gbps/ It maintains a live connection to each of 4 x HDMI inputs, 2 x HDMI outputs (mirrored or matrixed), and 1 x eARC audio output, and can switch between them "instantly" as you ask. You can switch with…
I tend to play games with my projector on mirroring computer output (for things like watching people play VR games socially), and I use a "cheaper" HDMI switcher for the projector to achieve this (it's one of the better ones you can buy in Amazon)—but this breaks the 4K60 HDR output for some games if I'm mirroring displays.
This might switcher might be fully featured enough that my computer won't balk at it.
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#163HDMI Switching like that takes long because there is a EDID negotiation going on between the minitor and the input devices. If you want to switch fast and often your best bet is getting an HDMI switcher that is basically always connected to the monitor and both sources and then toggles between the two. Beware of the supported resolutions and framerates. A cheap hack would also be to connect your second source to the…
Note that an expensive HDMI switcher is different from a cheap dongle goblin from Amazon. Try the cheap one first but if you really need instant switching you’re looking at a professional AV device. http://decimator.com/ Has some really good shit including (accidental) hdmi copy protection removal.
Sometimes the 400 Euro grabber works sometimes the 30 Euro one works. The expensive ones are surely more rugged tho.
I suspect all most manufacturers do is build a decice around some existing HDMI IC and if your stuff is supported by that IC and they didn't cut a ton of corners it works. Maybe you need the 4000 Euro price class to run it all, I never tried.
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#164HDMI Switching like that takes long because there is a EDID negotiation going on between the minitor and the input devices. If you want to switch fast and often your best bet is getting an HDMI switcher that is basically always connected to the monitor and both sources and then toggles between the two. Beware of the supported resolutions and framerates. A cheap hack would also be to connect your second source to the…
Is this something you've tried before and could go into more detail about? I've got an HDMI grabber for using a DSLR as a webcam, but never thought to output the display of one of my computers to another. This would solve a lot of issues regarding switching between work and personal laptops.
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
On the Atari and Amiga, the horizontal/vertical scan rates are constant I can't speak to the Atari, but my memory is that this is not true of the Amiga. The Amiga could do this amazing thing where it would display multiple resolutions on a monitor at the same time, divided horizontally. Analog was flexible that way. An Amiga could even display two different resolutions from two different sources on the same monitor a…
Yes, because the scan frequency didn't change -- that's what I'm trying to say (my terminology may have been a bit off). The timings of the horizontal and vertical sweep of the beam were constant; upon mode change the CRTC changed how scanout occurred, doubling the width or height of pixels in lower resolution mode but it didn't change the scan frequency , allowing the mode change to occur while the beam kept moving…
For the highest resolution you needed a better monitor though so I didn't have much experience with that one. The Atari Falcon also had more resolutions with instant switch but my memory is getting quite fuzzy there :-)
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#166HDMI Switching like that takes long because there is a EDID negotiation going on between the minitor and the input devices. If you want to switch fast and often your best bet is getting an HDMI switcher that is basically always connected to the monitor and both sources and then toggles between the two. Beware of the supported resolutions and framerates. A cheap hack would also be to connect your second source to the…
Why does the negotiation take so long, though? There doesn't intuitively seem to be a lot of information.
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#167This is one thing I really miss about analog tv. You could switch channels as fast as you could press the button. Everything now is so slow.
This is one of the things on my TODO-list for when I stumble upon a way to have infinite amounts of time: Learn "FPGA 'n stuff" and build my own display controller. Like many people here, I don't understand why this takes so much bloody time. Not just the input switching, but also switching resolution or refresh rate on the same input. So either I'd have an a-ha moment and see why it's not possible (more likely outco…
The hdcp handshake is a particularly bad mess which most manufacturers don't implement well due to a very confusing spec. My experience has been some devices start showing video right away and kill it if hdcp handshake fails, while other devices don't show video until hdcp handshake succeeds. Behavior is quite hardware dependent.
The commercial vendors like Extron (crosspoint switchers) and Crestron (digitalmedia switchers) have this figured out pretty well where switching is almost instant so it's definitely possible. I think Crestron has some technical papers out there that discuss the challenges involved.
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that an expensive HDMI switcher is different from a cheap dongle goblin from Amazon. Try the cheap one first but if you really need instant switching you’re looking at a professional AV device. http://decimator.com/ Has some really good shit including (accidental) hdmi copy protection removal.
I am a media technician myself and the odd thing is that I have found no real corellation between price and capabilities when it comes to HDMI switchers, splitters and grabbers. Sometimes the 400 Euro grabber works sometimes the 30 Euro one works. The expensive ones are surely more rugged tho. I suspect all most manufacturers do is build a decice around some existing HDMI IC and if your stuff is supported by that IC…
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#169This is one thing I really miss about analog tv. You could switch channels as fast as you could press the button. Everything now is so slow.
Yep, and everything was exactly the same video format, and all TVs had the same capabilities.
The slowness was present on VGA monitors as well, if you recall.
Slow switching is a tradeoff worth having, given that it allows me to have any number of digital resolutions and color depths available to me.
Re: Ask HN: Can you recommend an “instant-switch” Monitor? Does one exist?
#170Not on a monitor (that I'm aware of), but it is a major feature of signal distribution equipment for installed AV and broadcast. A large part of the delay that you are seeing is from EDID negotiation and HDCP. This happens of the 100kbit/s DDC channel and requires a bit of back and forth. On the above systems this is pre-negotiated so that switching can take place across a single frame. A lot of that equipment is lik…
100kbit/second is still blazing fast for communication which ought to be on the order of a hundred bytes... 4 seconds at 100kbit/s is 50kB. Why does it have to be so chatty?
When a suitable set of image parameters have been agreed HDCP (may) then step in to ruin your day. Again a nice walkthrough of that is available here: https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2012/08/27/reposted....
As other commenters have correctly noted, there's definite room for improvement. One thing to remember though is this involves hardware that can be in operation for the order of decades so there's a lot of cruft that accretes in order to maintain compatibility. Frankly it's mildly impressive that for the most part all the above happens in silence and continues to (mostly) work.