Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

news.ycombinator.com

161–170 of 447 posts

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#161

Red Hat. Worked there as an intern during college, continued for few more years and returned there after a brief stint at a startup. Work/life balance is great, most code public has so many advantages and colleagues are friendly and decent humans. Some teams might be worse than what I experienced, but even if I was growing mildly frustrated (i.e. pressure from product people to push product out of hte gate before it…

I'd be curious if the IBM acquisition has had any effect on that culture? Is that pressure from product people a result post-IBM?

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#162
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If we want to generalise: Eastern Europe is hit or miss. I had some good experiences and plenty of terrible ones (more so recently). I think that eastern Europe used to be good, but there are plenty of actors milking the scene and reputation of eastern Europe. I know 2 smart fellas making bank selling remote junior developers from Hungary and Poland to London clueless companies for slightly cheaper than senior London…

> maybe they should start learning Chinese. Despite all the cool Matrix aesthetic, I dread to think of a programming language in Chinese.

APL ^^ 3...

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#163
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If we want to generalise: Eastern Europe is hit or miss. I had some good experiences and plenty of terrible ones (more so recently). I think that eastern Europe used to be good, but there are plenty of actors milking the scene and reputation of eastern Europe. I know 2 smart fellas making bank selling remote junior developers from Hungary and Poland to London clueless companies for slightly cheaper than senior London…

> maybe they should start learning Chinese. Despite all the cool Matrix aesthetic, I dread to think of a programming language in Chinese.

The Chinese are consumate pragmatics. I think that it is more probable that we will be thinking of english as ONE OF the chinese languages 100 years from now than they forcing mandarim to us.

And I am not completely joking.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#164

I've never worked for a big famous tech firm, but I will absolutely tell you how I've managed to avoid hating work for 30 years: Find a relatively small firm, still owner-run and controlled. Avoid public firms. A corporation cannot show loyalty, but a HUMAN can. A manager has no real control -- their manager can reverse them. When you work for the owner, you can trust things a bit more IF you're working for a trustwo…

My experience was the opposite, the only time I've ever had someone pay me late, and on top of that asked me to work for free was when I was dealing with a very small business owner. You either need to have some VC funding, or be a well-established company for me to even want to apply. I guess there might be some unicorn bootstrapped exceptions to the rule, but in general I find the bigger the company the smoother th…

I could have written almost the same 2 paragraphs. Feels like you worked where I worked. Never again.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#165
post #24

I work for a small financial SaaS in Boston. 30-50 people. Nobody offshore. I've worked here for 18 years and 11 months and a couple of days. Yes, we're hiring. The best thing about the company are the people who are already here. The basic hiring criteria are "clever, competent and kind". That doesn't mean we never have disagreements, but they tend to be technical disagreements about the best approach to reach the s…

What does "Nobody offshore" means here?

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#166

I've been at Facebook for about a year and a half. Before this I was at startups in the marketing and financial industries. We've been under scrutiny for the whole time that I've been there, and the company is pretty unpopular from a vocal population on here, but it's been really nice to work for. We obviously have job security, and I've been very impressed with the management chain above me. At least on my team, the…

Memed? It's being accused of assisting with genocide abroad and culture destruction locally.

Memeing is a bunny with a pancake on its head. Facebook is accused of helping dictatorships hunt and kill actual humans.

Good paycheque though eh.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#167
post #24

I work for a small financial SaaS in Boston. 30-50 people. Nobody offshore. I've worked here for 18 years and 11 months and a couple of days. Yes, we're hiring. The best thing about the company are the people who are already here. The basic hiring criteria are "clever, competent and kind". That doesn't mean we never have disagreements, but they tend to be technical disagreements about the best approach to reach the s…

What does "Nobody offshore" means here?

It means they don't hire non-Americans, which tells you something else about the company.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#168

From my experience: - NVIDIA seems to have best balance of culture of competency, work satisfaction vs how well is run, although it is getting more bureaucratic as it grows - Google used to be good in many aspects but now things are deteriorating - Facebook is mixed bag, where Oculus part is more of a wild west and main FB is still ok better than Google - Amazon other than "hire to fire" (loading your RSUs towards th…

You worked for all of these places?

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#169
post #153

I've never worked for a big famous tech firm, but I will absolutely tell you how I've managed to avoid hating work for 30 years: Find a relatively small firm, still owner-run and controlled. Avoid public firms. A corporation cannot show loyalty, but a HUMAN can. A manager has no real control -- their manager can reverse them. When you work for the owner, you can trust things a bit more IF you're working for a trustwo…

counter point: after working for small owner-run companies where the owner took everything personally, I will forever only work in big tech. The owner ran the show and was emotional. Every time a competitor launched something new, they would change course and race to copy them. Ended up delivering nothing and eventually laid off after 1.5 years. At a big company, everyone is spending someone else's money and the peop…

The hard part about choosing the small business route is you have to do a really good job (and somewhat get lucky) at screening the owner and company. I had only ever worked at mega corps my entire carrier until my latest job at a Now I could have missed some red flags or just had bad luck and regretted it/had a bad experience but just passing a year in I'm happier than ever with work and really excited about the future for at least the next 2-3 years (after that will depend on what the company looks like at that point).

At the same time one could have missed red flags or just had bad luck with $MegaCorpN too. The company I left ended up outsourcing it's entire IT staff of thousands and rehiring a few core architects who now are all disappointed with the workload and most are looking elsewhere if they haven't already jumped ship. I've actaully worked toa get a few of those folks to come over to my current place.

Re: Ask HN: Who's not sucky to work for?

#170

I've never worked for a big famous tech firm, but I will absolutely tell you how I've managed to avoid hating work for 30 years: Find a relatively small firm, still owner-run and controlled. Avoid public firms. A corporation cannot show loyalty, but a HUMAN can. A manager has no real control -- their manager can reverse them. When you work for the owner, you can trust things a bit more IF you're working for a trustwo…

> Find a relatively small firm, still owner-run and controlled.

Is n’t that a single point of failure?

Post reply on HN