Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

news.ycombinator.com

161–170 of 322 posts

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#161

The internet actually works really well. Its problems are human.

I mean, kind of. It does work, but under the hood there's a big fossilized mess of a technology stack that could have been better had it not been the result of many years of accumulated unrelated solutions to different, smaller problems...

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#162
post #151
post #23

TL;DR: Constants shouldn't be hard coded in the software, they should always be in a separate config The problem is that it's the 60s. My first thought was "security", but unless you an also teach them about elliptic curves, they're going to use the security of the 1960s, which as we now know isn't very secure. Maybe at least having security baked in would help make it easier to switch to better security later, like…

So you're essentially pushing against specialized IP-oriented VLSI chips in everything from NICs to switches to routers... instead they should all have been reconfigurable general computing devices? Don't you think that would have slowed down the growth quite a bit?

Maybe. I'm just saying that we should teach people in the 60s to design for the future and make things extensible. Maybe we'd still have custom silicon, but they would be designed with an external bus to a second chip that can be easily switched out or upgraded or something as a way of dealing with future growth of address space.

Obviously it wouldn't apply to everything, but back in the 60s future growth was clearly not thought about the same way as today.

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#163

i would remove javascript.

I think there would always be something invented to take its place. It addresses a real need that lots of people have. If you want to remove it, you have to replace it with something else...

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#164
There is no need to put IP stacks on non-server endpoints unless you know what you are doing and the implications. Each non-server device could establish a context with the network as and when needed to send and receive traffic, as you did in the dial-up age. Removes a huge raft of security problems, IP address shortages, DDoS, privacy/tracking.

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#165
> How are you going to make the Internet better?

Anything that allows me to send files to a device of a person I know on a direct connection without a service in between and regardless of our locations in the world. Still an unsolved problem AFAIK.

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ad's got us here to begin with. Without ads the internet would have been only for the rich. There would also have been no google, no amazon, no android, no kindles. I'd still be ordering everything from the Sears Catalogue, waiting 6-8 weeks for it to arrive.

No Amazon, really? Amazon ships physical goods to your house in exchange for money--they aren't dependent on advertising. Even Google landed on advertising as a monetization technique but existed before it and easily could have been a sustainable business without it (though not the behemoth it has become).

Google existed before ads but had no revenue. Ads are the only thing that kept it alive other than investor money.

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#167
post #14

Require emails to be signed by the sender cryptographically.

We have DKIM and you can safely drop non-DKIM mail. This tells you the MTA is actually sending the mail. The problem is that these MTAs get hacked or people just hijack domains. Heck, the barrier to buying a domain is so low that this is a legit way of spamming too.

> safely drop non-DKIM mail

Yes, but the customer will blame you when e-mail from a misconfigured MTA doesn't arrive (from my experience running one).

If only we'd had DKIM from the start, preventing thousands of broken servers from being set up in the last twenty five years...

Re: Ask HN: You have one shot to redesign the Internet – what do you change?

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are cellphone numbers a dystopia?

Yeah, I keep getting solicitors and I can't easily change my number to something only my friends know. I also can't easily separate my business number from my personal number without paying for a second phone subscription, even though it wouldn't cost the phone company anything more.

Completely not that important, but I did this a year or so ago, committed 'the number' to google voice, and handed out my new one to close contacts. It took a bit for people to filter their calls correctly, and I could always answer the 'business line' regardless, but I have zero regrets about it now.
Post reply on HN