Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Curious to know if people still use IRC?

news.ycombinator.com

161–170 of 254 posts

Re: Ask HN: Curious to know if people still use IRC?

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very specific Googlers, mostly SREs, use IRC.

After I switched from SRE-SWE to just SWE, my team (of six SWEs) used IRC and it wasn't because of my influence, either.

In my experience most SWE teams just use the hangouts chat nowadays

Re: Ask HN: Curious to know if people still use IRC?

#163
post #154
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Side-note on the cloak: You'll want to make sure you're identified before you join any channels, or everyone will still see your IP. The best way to do this on networks that support it is to use SASL.

There are vanity vhosts and there are cloaks. Cloaks apply uniformally but will not mask the last bit of your reversed hostname. So it might leak info about your ISP or region but not your full IP. What you stated is true of vanity vhosts though. Which will mask the whole record only if you’re logged in. :)

I think this is a split in terminology, actually.

IRCds such as InspIRCd and UnrealIRCd speak of cloaks in the sense of user mode +x, commonly set on connection, which scrambles an incoming user's hostname/IP address to e.g. hidden-5npgt1.iinet.net.au or hidden-qjia2j.ncp0.j4h4.014d.2804.IP.

Freenode, nota bene the largest IRC network right now, uses cloaks to instead refers to a special format of vHost[1]. It does not offer Unreal-style cloaking.

I imagine this difference in terminology is what's prompted this exchange.

[1] https://freenode.net/kb/answer/cloaks

Re: Ask HN: Curious to know if people still use IRC?

#164
Let's say for example you work on a team doing identity for a large company that provides lots of services to a lot of the world, including email and chat. What infrastructure to the people who keep the system up use to communicate while the system is down? You guessed it! IRC.

Re: Ask HN: Curious to know if people still use IRC?

#165
post #159

I've used IRC pretty much forever. I use it for, err, online chat. If I want real-time chat I do it there. None of the other platforms offer anything other than fragmentation of the user base as far as I'm concerned. I don't care about the fact that like, you need to run a client all the time, ten year old me was leaving his computer on before he knew what a server even was, I do it anyway because I self host a ton o…

Is there a particular client you use or would recommend? I’ve used irssi on and off in the past, and bitchx occasionally, but I’d be curious to know what’s popular today.

I use weechat nowadays but it's all much of a muchness really.

It would be nice if weechat could connect to itself as a relay, my understanding is that it still can't. As a substitute I run it in tmux and connect to that.

Re: Ask HN: Curious to know if people still use IRC?

#168
post #101
post #15

Every day, It's become a social network of sorts for geeks, despite the age of the protocol I still find it the least "invasive" and most friendly experience, but that's probably because I spent the time configuring a client that's nice for me. (preview: http://imgs.fyi/img/9ve2.png ) I run a network even, called darkscience and it's available at irc.darkscience.net (TLS only on port 6697) the lobby is #darkscience i…

> I still find it the least "invasive" Doesn't it just broadcast your IP address pretty plainly?

Who really cares in this day if anyone knows your IP? It's not like that many of us are running servers from our home connection and thus vulnerable in some particularly pointed way. Behind a NAT you're pretty much fine unless some nation-state is out to get you.
Post reply on HN