Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

news.ycombinator.com

151–160 of 735 posts

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#151
post #95

People are sending us emails that are not just written with chatgpt, but I think they've automated the process as well, as parts of the prompt slip in. You can see things in the emails like: "I provided a concise, polite response from a candidate to a job rejection, expressing gratitude, a desire for feedback, and interest in future opportunities."

Ignoring the hilarity who in their right mind is replying to job denial emails? What the hellll…

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know, I kind of feel like leetcode interviews are a situation where the employer is cheating. I mean, you're admittedly filtering out a great number of acceptable candidates knowing that if you just find 1 in a 1000, that'll be good enough. It is patently unfair to the individuals that are smart enough to do your work, but poor at some farcical representation of the work. That is cheating. In my opinion, if a…

The employer sets the terms of the interview. If you don’t like them, don’t apply. What you’re suggesting here isn’t any different than submitting a fraudulent resume because you disagree with the required qualifications.

I would like to be paid though. What do I care about the terms of the interview as long as they hire me?

What is being suggested here is not participating in the mind numbing process that is called ‘applying for a job’.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#153
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those tests I never follow the rules, I just make something quick and dirty because I refuse to spend unpaid hours. In the interview the first question is why I didnt follow the instructions, and they think my reason is fair. Companies seem to think that we program just for fun and ask to make a full blown app... also underestimating the time candidates actually spend making it.

If you’re spending the time applying and submitting something then you might as well spend the extra 30 minutes or so to do it right, no?

Any time someone says ‘should only take a few hours’ they’re far underestimating the time it actually takes.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#154
post #68

My startup got acquired last year so I haven't interviewed anyone in a while, but my technical interview has always been: - share your screen - download/open the coding challenge - you can use any website, Stack Overflow, whatever, to answer my questions as long as it's on the screenshare My goal is to determine if the candidate can be technically productive, so I allow any programming language, IDE, autocompleter, e…

I recently interviewed for my team and tried this same approach. I thought it made sense because I want to see how people can actually work and problem solve given all the tools at their disposal, just like on the job. It proved to be awkward and clumsy very quickly. Some candidates resisted it since they clearly thought it would make them judged harsher. Some candidates were on the other extreme and basically tried…

What are you supposed to ask chatGPT if you can’t just ask it the answer? That’d confuse me too.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#155

My company, a very very large company, is transitioning back to only in-person interviews due to the rampant amount of cheating happening during interviews. As an interviewer, it's wild to me how many candidates think they can get away with it, when you can very obviously hear them typing, then watching their eyes move as they read an answer from another screen. And the majority of the time the answer is incorrect an…

Is it cheating if I can solve the problem using the tools of AI, or is it just solving the problem?

For the goal of the interview - showing your knowledge and skills - you are failing miserably. People know what LLMs can do, the interview is about you.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#156

My company, a very very large company, is transitioning back to only in-person interviews due to the rampant amount of cheating happening during interviews. As an interviewer, it's wild to me how many candidates think they can get away with it, when you can very obviously hear them typing, then watching their eyes move as they read an answer from another screen. And the majority of the time the answer is incorrect an…

The industry (all industries really) might want to reconsider online applications, or at least privilege in-person resume drop-offs because the escalating ai application/evaluation war that's happening doesn't seem to be helping anyone.

No it's because AI shifted power over to the applicant.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#157
post #154
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently interviewed for my team and tried this same approach. I thought it made sense because I want to see how people can actually work and problem solve given all the tools at their disposal, just like on the job. It proved to be awkward and clumsy very quickly. Some candidates resisted it since they clearly thought it would make them judged harsher. Some candidates were on the other extreme and basically tried…

What are you supposed to ask chatGPT if you can’t just ask it the answer? That’d confuse me too.

Just another interview methodology pulled out of someone's ass. They don't know.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My first read of this was they made a joke (not wise when scheduling for interviews sure but maybe funny) by intentionally responding that way. This is because my brain couldn't fathom what is likely the reality here -- that someone was just pumping your email thru AI and pumping the response back unedited and unsanitized, and so the first thing you got back was just the first "part" of the AI response. ...Christ.

A friend of mine works with industrial machines, and once was tasked with translating machine's user's manual, even though he doesn't speak English. I do, and I had some free time, so I helped him. As an example, I was given user manual for a different, but similar machine. 1. The manual was mostly a bunch of phrases that were grammatically correct, but didn't really convey much meaning 2. The second half of the manu…

I once worked in the US for a Japanese company that had their manuals "translated" into English and then sent on for polishing. Like the parent, it would be mostly "a bunch of phrases that were grammatically correct, but didn't really convey much meaning" . I couldn't spend more than an hour a day on that kind of thing; more than that and it would start to make sense.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#159
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those tests I never follow the rules, I just make something quick and dirty because I refuse to spend unpaid hours. In the interview the first question is why I didnt follow the instructions, and they think my reason is fair. Companies seem to think that we program just for fun and ask to make a full blown app... also underestimating the time candidates actually spend making it.

If you’re spending the time applying and submitting something then you might as well spend the extra 30 minutes or so to do it right, no?

Not if you’re applying to hundreds, or thousands of jobs. Unless you know someone, it’s a quantity game.

Re: Ask HN: What is interviewing like now with everyone using AI?

#160
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The employer sets the terms of the interview. If you don’t like them, don’t apply. What you’re suggesting here isn’t any different than submitting a fraudulent resume because you disagree with the required qualifications.

I would like to be paid though. What do I care about the terms of the interview as long as they hire me? What is being suggested here is not participating in the mind numbing process that is called ‘applying for a job’.

Wanting to be paid under false pretenses is the definition of fraud.
Post reply on HN