Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

news.ycombinator.com

151–160 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#151

I'm not sure I expected it to take the world "by storm", but I expected more from Google Wave. It was a great concept, by a major company, but it was too slow on release and the rollout killed it. In retrospect, it probably wouldn't have lasted anyways. Google was in the process of minimizing their federated communication services by that point, and that was another major selling point of Google Wave's initial propos…

i mean... there was another product that Google rolled out that was on an invitation basis. Last I checked Gmail is doing pretty well...

facetious comparison aside, i think the (Yegge)? rant about how Google does things applied here.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#152
post #133

Smartwatches. I was convinced enough to bet two years of my life working on them.

I have two big reasons why I didn't get a smart watch. Number one is the price, I just don't think it's worth hundreds of dollars not to pick up my phone when I get a notification. The other is that the interface is too small to do anything but consuming notifications or looking at a compass. And, I just don't see the problem being solved by speech recognition either, I don't want the rest of the bus to know that I h…

My reason: Don't like to add another thing on the power cord every night.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#153
post #47

Lisp, p2p everything, and GNU/Linux on desktop...

Well, Linux on the desktop kind of happened this year, it's just running on the Windows desktop, this time.

Here's how I set up Windows 10 coming from Linux. https://github.com/chx/chx.github.io/wiki/How-I-set-up-my-Wi...

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#154

Mobile/Micro payments. There is still no friction free solution, where I would be sure, my mother could use it.

This would be my #1, as it would have drastically changed (for better or worse) the internet. Although, it's a psycological problem instead of a technical one. You can put a PayPal button or Stripe popup on your page using technology today, which will usually take 10 seconds (given that the user is logged into those services, since we're assuming that this micro-payments practice is common), but it's a wild expectation that people would actually get used to willingly give up a nonzero amount of time to pay for something so small as an article.

Another problem may have been this. If everyone on the internet agreed that say, watching a video should cost $0.02/minute, then people would get accustomed to paying this amount because that's such a small cost. But it's only a $0.02 decision for a content creator to restrict or allow it to be watched for free, and if say, 5% of artists just decided to "eat" the potenential earnings, then you'd have 5% of free videos and 95% premium videos. The 5% free videos would prevent the 95% of videos from being watched, because why would anyone pay to watch a video if you can watch another one for free. Basically I'm saying that this idealization of micropayment content is destroyed by free content, whether that is a good thing or not. I do this myself with respect to Android apps, since I don't take my time seriously enough to pay the occassional $1 per app.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#155

I'm not sure I expected it to take the world "by storm", but I expected more from Google Wave. It was a great concept, by a major company, but it was too slow on release and the rollout killed it. In retrospect, it probably wouldn't have lasted anyways. Google was in the process of minimizing their federated communication services by that point, and that was another major selling point of Google Wave's initial propos…

Internally in Google it was really, really hard to get in the Wave team. So many people felt the opportunity to show what they can and get a career boost. So, presumably, they had best Google engineers working on that product. What I want to say is an obvious thing -- stellar team doesn't imply success.

thanks for the anecdote! the politics must have been savage. also means the team probably cared more about being on a cool project than the actual problem area itself.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#156

I'm disappointed none of the various constructed "universal" languages (like Esperanto) ever took off. Having a single common language spoken by everyone would be enormously useful. As it is, the closest we have is English, but it's a natural language and therefore complicated and difficult to learn.

English is a surprisingly versatile language. You can get your point across with pidgin english just fine, and it's the most spoken language in the world.

On the other hand you have people who master the language on a whole new level, like Douglas Adams.

Re: Ask HN: What tech were you convinced would take the world by storm but didn't?

#160
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NFC seems to be rather popular.

I bought my NFC Phone 3,9 Years ago, never used it. Apple is now doing something with it and it might come but it should have taken of way earlier. Right now i have already a contact less credit card and that works like a charm.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t Apple Pay and Android Pay already use NFC?
Post reply on HN