Every single app that I use, I try and make sure it is native. I shun electron apps at all cost. It's because people who put in effort to use the native APIs put in a lot more effort in the app in general based on my anecdotal evidence. It is also more performant and smaller in size, things that I cherish. It also pays homage to limits and striving to come up with new ways of overcoming them, which hackers would have…
It is true that there is a a correlation between lower level programming and better programming in general. You probably won't see someone writing asm but creating crazy O^2 algorithms that run on every frame with memory allocations that run in the inner loop. At the same time a native win32 program can pack significant functionality into a 20KB exe. Put these together and you have a program where everything is insta…
Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
141–150 of 777 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#142Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#143Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#144I don't see any `web first` or Electron solution replacing Reaper or Blender in a foreseeable future. One exception I'm intrigued with is VS Code, which seems to be widely popular. May be I need to try it to form my own opinion.
Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thunderbird isn't a native app, for the record. It's a web application similar to an Electron application, but with extra steps.
Eh. XUL isn't really a web technology the same way as Electron.
Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#146IMO desktop apps aren’t quite equivalent to native apps. Native apps look and behave in a consistent way. They have • Familiar UI primitives: - Controls and chrome are in the same place - Font sizes are the same across apps - Consistent icons and button shapes • Support standard keyboard shortcuts (including obscure ones that developers re-implementing these UIs might not know about) - All the Emacs-style keybindings…
Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#147Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#148In some (most) cases, desktop apps could be better - performance, latency, offgrid capabilities, and even privacy. In most cases, I prefer offline desktop apps, then their online counterparts. One area which is really tough to nail is cross-platform support though. Getting a good app on one system is hard enough, getting it in all three - rarely done. This is one of the things where web shines. From business standpoi…
Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#149Re: Ask HN: Is there still a place for native desktop apps?
#150I'm going to be slammed for using these two words, but for any real work you need to have as few layers of indirection between the user and the machine as possible, and this includes the UX, in the sense that it is tailored to the fastest and most comfortable data entry and process monitoring. I don't see any `web first` or Electron solution replacing Reaper or Blender in a foreseeable future. One exception I'm intri…