Earlier quoted context omitted.
It really surprises me that people are using pass or any other password manager developed as open source. Yes, the code is open source, but unless you download the code yourself and compile it, which not many people do on desktop and no one does for mobile clients, you have to trust the deploy process of a random group of people. None of the people even have to be malicious. They just have to have an insecure deploy…
pass is a single ~700 line shell script wrapping gpg and optionally git. while long for a shell script, that's pretty easy reading for a password manager, and easy enough to understand.
Not saying that a company could not have a malicious release. It could. I just think the odds are much lower because their release process has better security controls and is generally audited better.