Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

news.ycombinator.com

121–130 of 176 posts

Re: Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

#121
It varies. What are you sharing? Are you explaining complex concepts? Are you telling a story? Different people will find different benefits for public thinking.

Personally, small private notes here and there help me ponder without disrupting my stream of thoughts. Without having to… X.

I think both are useful.

Re: Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

#122
We are all humans. And talking in extremes here:

Introverts think in private. After that they may share. They need time to think through stuff.

Extroverts think while engaging with others. Sharing supports and facilitates the thought process.

You'll have a different set of pros and cons according to that and where you fall on the scale.

Re: Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

#123
Biggest con of public thinking is the time/opportunity cost. It takes time to write, even more to write something others, who don't have the same context as you, to understand.

Editing is also a pain.

Now that I said that, check out my blog at https://langsoul.com

Re: Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

#127
Pros of thinking in public:

- You may get feedback on the idea you posted, this could from more experienced people than you and people who deal with your idea. - Valuable insights. - See if the idea or your thoughts have already been executed, you can learn a lot from public thinking.

Now of course, if your idea is very good someone who has more resources than you can implement it. So you can publicly think until you get enough knowledge to get a good idea and then privately think about that.

Re: Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

#129
post #2

There are quite a few things that are probably true, but you can't say publicly without attracting a lot of unwanted angry attention. If your line of thinking approaches any of these topics, it makes it difficult to think through the issue in public.

Maybe I'm thinking about this wrong, but getting a lot of angry feedback from what you consider to be axiomatic truths seems like a useful benefit to thinking in public. Lots of topics might attract the occasional troll or disagreement from certain corners, but when your thinking regularly draws the kind of widespread condemnation I suspect you're talking about, a reasonable person might consider how "probably true"…

> but when your thinking regularly draws the kind of widespread condemnation I suspect you're talking about, a reasonable person might consider how "probably true" their thinking really is.

The truth is not a popularity contest.

Re: Ask HN: Pros and cons of thinking in public vs. in private?

#130
post #22

I post on LinkedIn, Stack Exchange, and this site using my real name. The benefit of doing so is that I have to keep myself in check and really think before I write - yes, there are edits and deletions - and overall the effect has been very positive for me. Being active on the chemistry SE site has actually proven to be of value in getting jobs related to chemistry - at least 3 employers have said it was useful to se…

there might come a day when I have to do some reputation control should someone impersonate me

Why would anyone need to have the same name as you to impersonate you? They just have to say "I am toddm!", and the internet will generally accept it.

Post reply on HN