Implementing this properly involves having your own search index. And that's pretty expensive.
Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
121–130 of 236 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#122Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are they blocking anyway? Anything important? There's so many Chinese forums for hardware/firmware hacking/mods, a shame translators are still very bad...
Definitely. What if I want to research information on a certain 1989 student protest to write a paper about censorship?
Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#124What are folks’ non-commoditized heuristics for finding new things online? I was intrigued by how dorkweed’s approach has changed over time, as described in a reply to a sibling comment. As general search results get watered down and rotten tomato inflation maybe trends towards reflecting company interests rather than my interest-level, maybe it’s worth re-evaluating the vetting avenues we take as users. Here’s mine:…
Personal trick: I follow reaction video blogs, and if they are reacting to something then it is usually worth watching. But reaction blogs are only for short videos and other short form content.
Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#125[search term] -google -youtube -facebook ... -top100website and it should work.
I found a list of the top 1m alexa websites here:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/alexa-static/top-1m.csv.zip
An add-on with that list should do the work.
Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#126Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#127Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
[retracted] and I hope this is just a misunderstanding. As the director of the World Health Organization (WHO) said, 2019-nCoV is a novel (new) coronavirus.[0] The CDC defines coronavirus as a virus that was not previously known — check the FAQ, “what is a novel coronavirus?”[0.5] They changed the name of this coronavirus to reflect the disease more accurately to COVID-19.[1] The CDC has a list of other coronavirus’…
Excuse the incivility, but no. COVID-19: disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2: strain of SARS-CoV SARS-CoV: severe accute respiratory syndrome coronavirus Coronavirus: virus that causes respiratory diseases in mammals, such as SARS (SARS-CoV) MERS (MERS-CoV), and COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)
Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#129I think there's a simple google way. Just add `-bigwebsite.com` to your query. [search term] -google -youtube -facebook ... -top100website and it should work. I found a list of the top 1m alexa websites here: http://s3.amazonaws.com/alexa-static/top-1m.csv.zip An add-on with that list should do the work.
- there's probably a pretty low limit for size of Google queries, you'll likely hit it quickly
- you won't be able to search for e.g a story about YouTube censoring some content
Re: Ask HN: Is there a search engine which excludes the world's biggest websites?
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
[retracted] and I hope this is just a misunderstanding. As the director of the World Health Organization (WHO) said, 2019-nCoV is a novel (new) coronavirus.[0] The CDC defines coronavirus as a virus that was not previously known — check the FAQ, “what is a novel coronavirus?”[0.5] They changed the name of this coronavirus to reflect the disease more accurately to COVID-19.[1] The CDC has a list of other coronavirus’…
Excuse the incivility, but no. COVID-19: disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2: strain of SARS-CoV SARS-CoV: severe accute respiratory syndrome coronavirus Coronavirus: virus that causes respiratory diseases in mammals, such as SARS (SARS-CoV) MERS (MERS-CoV), and COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)
Excuse the incivility, but no. SARS-CoV-2 is not a strain or type of SARS-CoV. The viruses share ancestors, but SARS-CoV-2 did not come directly from SARS-CoV. SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are in the category of beta coronaviruses[0].
"The whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis presented that two Bat SARS-like CoVs (ZXC21 and ZC45) were the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2."[1]
[0] https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/3/240/htm
[1] https://www.mdpi.com/pathogens/pathogens-09-00240/article_de...