Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would say you need to stand up for your users not your product. A gorgeous code base that doesn't do what your users want doesn't help anyone.
I don’t know. It is important to listen to your users, but not necessarily do what your user’s want. Especially in the context of the user’s role. Adding a thousand requested features also has its drawbacks.
Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
121–130 of 259 posts
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#122People are the only thing that matters. Deadlines come and go, companies go bankrupt or get their entire C-suite arrested in midnight raids, competitors come in and break everything and turn the company into a zombie. The thing that endures is the people. If you have good people on your team, consider yourself lucky; being a great boss is one of the best ways to cement a lifelong connection to the best people, and you'll get way more benefit from it than you deserve.
Nothing is straightforward or face value. Understand this and don't try to change it. There's a lot that you'll have to learn for yourself, but keep your priorities and loyalties straight, don't buy into anyone's bullshit too far, and you'll be fine. Good luck.
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#123Top mistakes by new leads: - Not delegating. New leads often feel that if they're not writing code (or doing whatever it means to be an individual contributor), they're slacking off. The definition of "work" has changed. It now means "helping your team succeed". If you try to be an individual contributor, you are doing your old job instead of your new one, and you'll get overwhelmed and sink. - Not asking questions.…
"tech lead" is not considered an individual contributor role? Is it considered a management role? I'm realizing I'm not quite sure what is meant by a "tech lead" role.
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#124Assume that, for the people on your team, work is a #4 or #5 priority. And there's nothing wrong with this, as long as they're giving you a solid 80-90% effort during working hours. If you ask them to put work ahead of family or faith or rest, or if you somehow expect more than 100% effort from them, you're going to drive away the ones who have other options. And the reason they have other options is because they're…
People who do great work tend to think about their work all the time. No one thinks about their fourth priority all the time.
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#125Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#1261) You will not need to trust others to write better code/systems then you and that you will very likely be unable to code anymore.
2) Establish a good relationship with your team members. Seek for people who you can delegate to and trust. Trust and reliable people are really hard to find. When shit hits the fan - and it absolutely does - you'll need that.
3) You need people who will push and people who will follow. Having just one group and not the others is a recipe for disaster.
4) Establish what things you should care for and what not. The amount of shit is insane and it only gets worse you need to have a threshold on when and on what to react.
5) Do you own research as much as possible on key things.
6) Keep asking "why". It annoys me as f* but also forces you to go deeper with explaining and understanding of the problem. (don't wanna say google "Five whys")
7) Encourage people to go deeper, to learn more to become experts.
9) Have 1-on-1s. Regular. Scheduled. Talk about life/work. Try to find how you can make the place and challenges better. Help them grow in an organisation and professionally.
10) Sketch things out. Write em' down. Otherwise, you'll go insane repeating stuff.
I sincerely wish you good luck.
P.s.: People have more bugs and are sometimes even more broken than software. :D
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would say you need to stand up for your users not your product. A gorgeous code base that doesn't do what your users want doesn't help anyone.
If one defines gorgeousness as ease of grok, then gorgeousness directly contributes to the wellbeing of users through maximizing the technology's ability to quickly and effectively adapt to their needs as they arise. Agreed that it's a secondary concern to fulfilling the featureset.
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#128Never consider yourself senior to someone unless you can do their work, and until they have demonstrated they can't do it. Otherwise, stand back and let people work. You doing their work is sometimes going to be needed, but a 'good team' has an equitable workload. Be willing to do any of it. The biggest thing a team leader can do is help the team communicate with itself. The worst thing a team leader can do is create…
The point I am getting at is that it is OK and I'd argue optimal if the team leader knows less than the person they are leading and the team leader has to ask them questions about how something works, but their job is to know enough to be able to make decisions and get a feel for things.
Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#129Re: Ask HN: Advice for a new and inexperienced tech lead?
#130Few things I would like to say: It will no longer be about you. It will all be about your team. Make sure you create a great team, nurture them, train them, teach them how to think critically (in doing so yourself). Ask your team to write out everything they plan to do before they actually do it. Reason with them on what they wrote and what approach decisions they plan to take. Teach them to think long term. Writing…
Respectfully disagree on the "write it out first" advice. I'd argue "think it out first" or "talk it out first" is sufficient. I found while scaling my team tended to bury themselves in miles of docs that really did not serve the customer or the company. A janky kind of working prototype of a solution is worth a ton more than a well thought out doc.