Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 125 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#111
If you’re using claude code/cursor, you should be using plan mode.

There are 3 major steps:

(Plan mode)

1. assuming this is an existing codebase, load the relevant docs/existing code into context (usually by typing @

2. Ask it to make a plan for the feature you want to implement. Assuming you’ve already put some thought into this, be as specific and detailed as you can. Ask it to build a plan that’s divided into individually variable steps. Read the plan file that it spits out, correct and bad assumptions it made, ask it questions if you’re unclear one what it’s saying, refine, etc.

(agent mode) Ask it to build the plan, one step at a time. After it builds each step verify that it’s correct, or have it help you verify it’s correct in a way you can observe.

I have been following this basic process mostly with Opus 4.5 in a mixture of claude code and cursor working on a pretty niche image processing pipeline (also some advanced networking stuff on the side) and have hand-written basically zero code.

People say - “your method sounds like a lot of work too” and that’s true, it is still work, but designing at a high level how I want some CUDA kernel to work and how it fits into the wider codebase and then describing it in a few sentences is still much faster than doing all of the above anyway and then hand writing 100 lines of CUDA (which I don’t know that well).

I’d conservatively estimate that i’ve made 2x the progress in the same amount of time as if I had been doing this without LLM tools.

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That isn't what the hype is. If that's the kind of stuff you're reading about or watching, you should find better sources. You can one-shot some things, and it makes for an impressive demo (oh yay, yet another video game made instantly) but anything larger and more useful will probably be a conversation. (Though not necessarily with a human, AIs can discuss it among themselves too.) Your first one-shot might be a goo…

> If that's the kind of stuff you're reading about or watching HN - posts and comments - is full of it. And my personal experiments with the free chatbots contradict it ofc.

Well, I've offered what I can to help. If your experience is mostly free chatbots, I would definitely suggest trying Opus 4.5 or 4.6 in Claude Code. The agentic harness of the software around the model (ie Claude Code) is important. Consider also that some of us have been doing this for a year and have already built our own MCP server tooling to go faster. Giving your AI the same kind of deterministic software tools that you use is important (eg make sure your AI has access to a diff tool, don't make it try and do that "in its head", you wouldn't ask that of a human).

As for listening to Hacker News... yeah, this is one of the worst places (well, Mastodon is worse) and HN is surprisingly AI-doomerish. I don't check in here very often anymore, and as of this week I just get Claude to summarize HN headlines as a morning podcast for me instead.

My own experience: my first few uses of Claude in Dec 2024 seemed rubbish, I didn't get it. Then one day I asked it to make me a search engine. The one shot from that wasn't perfect, but it worked, and I saw it build it in front of my eyes. That was the moment & I kept iterating on it. I haven't used Google or Kagi in almost a year now.

Anyway, hope it helps, but if not using AI makes you feel more comfortable, go with what fills your life with more value & meaning & enjoyment.

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#113

I think at the current state of the art, LLM tools can help you build things very quickly, but they can't help you build something you yourself are incapable of building, at least not in a sustained way. They need hand holding and correction constantly.

I don't think that's true, I've seen examples to the contrary. Here for example a recent article [1] from a non programmer building a tool. The article is long so I pasted the relevant part below. My thoughts go more in the direction, the article author built something that is complicated for non technical people, but in essence simple -- he says it so himself "copy paste". What if what the OP here is building is som…

Well congratulations on having an opinion!

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If that's the kind of stuff you're reading about or watching HN - posts and comments - is full of it. And my personal experiments with the free chatbots contradict it ofc.

Well, I've offered what I can to help. If your experience is mostly free chatbots, I would definitely suggest trying Opus 4.5 or 4.6 in Claude Code. The agentic harness of the software around the model (ie Claude Code) is important. Consider also that some of us have been doing this for a year and have already built our own MCP server tooling to go faster. Giving your AI the same kind of deterministic software tools…

> I haven't used Google or Kagi in almost a year now.

So you have the resources to index the whole www on your own?

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#116
Similarly underwhelming experience. I have been using it for about a week. I like how unlike Gemini or ChatGPT I don't have to copy+paste code. I have to keep going back to it to tell it I don't want it to access unrelated project folders beyond the scope of the problem, then it runs out of tokens for the next few hours, or gives me a response of varying quality.

My pattern matching brain says this is normal for hype. It's a good product, but no where near to the level you read about in some places (like HN in this case)

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, I've offered what I can to help. If your experience is mostly free chatbots, I would definitely suggest trying Opus 4.5 or 4.6 in Claude Code. The agentic harness of the software around the model (ie Claude Code) is important. Consider also that some of us have been doing this for a year and have already built our own MCP server tooling to go faster. Giving your AI the same kind of deterministic software tools…

> I haven't used Google or Kagi in almost a year now. So you have the resources to index the whole www on your own?

No, but I index parts of the web that are important to myself, sites I frequently reference. (I have all of Simon Willison's site indexed, for example.) It turns out that a simple SQLite database is a lot more capable and faster than I thought. I index from my laptop, using another tool I built with Claude. I don't crawl or spider, I focus on indexing from sitemap.xml files and RSS feeds. I have about 1.5 Million pages in my local index, and I get search results in 40ms - 70ms, thereabouts.

For every search that doesn't find results - and of course that's still the majority - it falls back to a meta-search combining results from Brave, Mojeek & Marginalia. The core of that metasearch is what Claude 3.5v2 generated for me in a one-shot back in Dec 2024. Kagi is just a metasearch with a very small local index as well, and my main purpose in building this was replacing Kagi for my needs.

The last 10% of my queries were widget queries like currency conversion, distance & temperature conversion etc that I was using for about 10% of my search queries.

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#118

You aren't telling us anything about how you're using it. So how can we tell you what you're doing wrong? You're just reporting what happened. You haven't even said what programming language you're trying to use, or even what platform. It sounds to me like you didn't do much planning, you just gave it a prompt to build away. My preferred method of building things, and I've built a lot of things using Claude, is to ha…

Yeah if the prompt is as specific as this post, then that's probably the issue...

Re: Ask HN: Why is my Claude experience so bad? What am I doing wrong?

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could you explain how a chat session progresses, with an example if possible?

I start with what I want to build. In the initial prompt I provide an overview of what I want, and then some specifics. Last night I added an archive to the Daily Challenge mode, so if you missed a day's challenge you could go back and play it. This is what my initial prompt looked like: --- I'd like to add an archives mode to the daily challenge. This will allow players to complete any daily challenges they didn't a…

Sounds like I should give Claude Code another try. The last time I worked with it, it was quite eager to code without a good plan, and would overcomplicate things all the time.

Not entirely relevant, but the example I remember is I asked for help with SQL to concatenate multiple rows into a single column with SQL Server and instead of reminding me to use STRING_AGG, it started coding various complicated joins and loops.

So my experience is/was a little different. Regardless, I think I should take one of my old programs and try implementing it from ground up by explaining the issue I'm trying to solve to see how things progress, and where things fail.

Post reply on HN