Ask HN: Is “prompt injection” going to be a new common vulnerability?
111–116 of 116 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is “prompt injection” going to be a new common vulnerability?
#112Re: Ask HN: Is “prompt injection” going to be a new common vulnerability?
#113Yes. Prompt injection will continue to be a common vulnerability for quite a while, from what I've seen. I wrote a bunch about this back in September: - https://simonwillison.net/2022/Sep/12/prompt-injection/ was I believe the first blog entry to use the term "prompt injection" - https://simonwillison.net/2022/Sep/16/prompt-injection-solut... - "I don't know how to solve prompt injection" - talks about how, unlike at…
“You can’t solve programming security problems with more programming.” I think it’s definitely possible to detect “escape” attempts, and to train the model in the first place to respect its directions. It’s just not an actual security problem, the models contain no secrets nor control any levers. You get some bad optics is all.
Re: Ask HN: Is “prompt injection” going to be a new common vulnerability?
#114Re: Ask HN: Is “prompt injection” going to be a new common vulnerability?
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the danger seems to be that there is no currently documented way to completely remove these possible outputs I know OpenAI likes throwing around terms like "danger" and "harm" liberally, but is this really a danger ? Outside of hypothetical scenarios where someone wires ChatGPT to a self-driving trolley.
Yes, there are absolutely dangers. It shouldn't be possible for a depressed person to convince a chatbot to tell them to commit suicide. There are some people who only need the tiniest push on a bad day.
Re: Ask HN: Is “prompt injection” going to be a new common vulnerability?
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
>""Open""AI OpenAI was never open. It's named that to invoke good feelings, not because there's any meaningful 'openness' to their work.
They released CLIP and they release papers/descriptions of their work for all their other products, enough for people to reproduce them. That's quite open.