Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 124 posts

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This pattern is so pervasive with all the payment processors: * Your funds are suddenly frozen. No easy recourse (if any) * The percentage they withhold is suddenly higher. Tough luck * Your business is deemed high risk and they cut ties. Their reasoning is a black box Why is there never advance warning? It's the lack of courtesy that gets to me.

> Why is there never advance warning? It's the lack of courtesy that gets to me. They give you advanced warning in the T&C. If they gave more warning, this could assist people who commit fraud. Fraud is not some imaginary issue. It's very real and very problematic. I'll say it again, get your own merchant account if you don't like this.

> If they gave more warning, this could assist people who commit fraud.

Sorry, no. Their inability and/or incompetence at avoiding fraud without mysterious hidden "rules" (i.e., security through obscurity) is their problem.

Not the customer's.

"Double secret probation". Bah.

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#113
post #22

Is there an equivalent to Stripe, from a DX perspective, that allows you to create an actual merchant account instead of being a sub account of Stripe? Having an actual merchant account, and going through KYB, seems like it’d solve a lot of these problems.

> that allows you to create an actual merchant account

Plenty!

An API? Something that isn't SOAP XML over a private tunnel? Developer experience similar to having faeces thrown at you?

Not really.

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#115
post #72

Contact your state’s money transmitter regulator [1]. If you suspect bad faith, looping in FinCEN may not be a bad idea [2]. [1] https://www.mtraweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Contact-l... [2] https://www.fincen.gov/contact

Given how buddy-buddy payment industry is, I'd advise against this unless a lawyer is willing to take it pro-bono on the basis that your case is so strong it'd be a layup.

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He’s not wrong. The length of the reply doesn’t make it good or worthy when most of it is wishy washy we’ll do better in the future we promise without any concrete steps to make that happen or metrics to prove so. In fact I would say he’s doing a bad job by the amount of stripe fucked me posts here recently.

You don't hear about the positive outcomes of support cases, but you'll hear a lot about those that don't work out the way they're supposed to, and you'll also hear a lot about those where someone feels wronged even though they've misbehaved. The complainer can also misrepresent the case, while Stripe cannot disclose how they see it. Making any assumptions about service quality on that base is not wise.

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> are literally funding themselves out of deposits No, they probably are not. It’s illegal and money transmitters are regulated. What they are doing is collecting interest. One tends to see less scrupulous transmitters hold funds longer when rates rise. I didn’t think Stripe fell in this category, but it’s becoming difficult to say. > good one is business selling gift cards You’re right. (Also customer deposits.) Thi…

> It’s illegal and money transmitters are regulated. It's only illegal if the regulator enforces action. Good luck getting regulators to enforce action on something like this.

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#118

I’m the person leading the project to make sure that people have fewer bad experiences with Stripe. I’m not sure what is driving the uptick in posts on the subject to HN in particular (obviously we pay attention to broader online discussion in addition to monitoring our support systems, though we know it creates an incentive for people to publicize their situation). On the topic of Stripe and these kinds of incidents…

>I’m the person leading the effort to make sure that people have fewer bad experiences with Stripe. No offence, but you're doing a bad job.

Please don't cross into personal attack, regardless of how strongly you feel.

It's not in the community interest to drive away people who are posting about their work. For most of us, our work is what we know the most about—so that would be a strict loss of interesting discussion.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree - there's multiple problems to solve (a) make incorrect actions exceedingly rare (b) correct them quickly (c) give people who reach out about them substantive help. Have major initiatives underway to improve on all 3. We're furthest along on (a), more to share soon. Interaction of (b)(c) is particularly complex, as we find the right way to make high-stakes decisions while being responsive to people asking for h…

I'm not sure what the disconnect here is, I'm pretty sure the answer is uncomplicated. You hire support people and train and pay them well. I get that this isn't some sort of sexy tech solution but like, that's what we want as customers. I don't really care about any of this crap, nobody cares. We want two things from you, we want to charge people's credit cards, and if something goes wrong we want to be able to TALK…

How much more are you willing to pay for being able to reach a human? I don't know what Stripe's fees structure is typically, maybe put it in terms of a percentage on transactions? An additional 1% on transactions?

Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The person posts an essay on their perspective and that’s what you have to say?

He’s not wrong. The length of the reply doesn’t make it good or worthy when most of it is wishy washy we’ll do better in the future we promise without any concrete steps to make that happen or metrics to prove so. In fact I would say he’s doing a bad job by the amount of stripe fucked me posts here recently.

Yes, he was, and he was rightfully flagged and deleted for it. Do you expect a banking/legal/money laundering case to be aired out on HN? Come on.
Post reply on HN