Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 21 posts

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#11

IANAL but here's what I think an attorney who took the time to look the whole thing over would say: The language in the contract (that you posted) seems pretty cut and dried, but I don't know whether that's actually going to hold up in a court of law. You entered a contest expecting the contest holders to hold the contest correctly. When the flaw was exposed, they did not honor it. That means your work was in vain. T…

In the UK at least there are quite stringent rules on how you can run a competition - give away a car? Abide by the rules.

I did not realize this might be a gray area.

I will do some research on how I can find some representation. Any tips, or experience with who I might get in contact with? Am I looking for some sort of technology or competition specialist?

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#12
post #7
post #5

Sounds like they tried to mitigate the situation in a reasonable manner. If they name you as fourth, then the formerly fourth place finisher gets upset. Some things are like futbol - there's no instant replay. Lawyering up isn't going to impress anyone.

I get the instant replay analogy, but I have a problem with a bug in their software impacting the results of the competition. I work in software, so I get living with bugs and understanding they are always going to be there. But I am unhappy that Kaggle/GE announced the winners via press release at the same the rest of the competition field was notified. It makes it impossible for a competitor to dispute the final re…

>"It makes it impossible for a competitor to dispute the final results."

Yes. That's the purpose.

The teleology of gamified competition is toward declaring a winner. The rules are structured with that in mind. Those rules are different from the marketplace where protesting and litigation are allowed and consequently, declared winners are simply a matter of opinion, not fact.

Accepting mistakes as part of the game is sportsmanship. And it was a game. Best to move on to the next one: http://www.kaggle.com/competitions

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get the instant replay analogy, but I have a problem with a bug in their software impacting the results of the competition. I work in software, so I get living with bugs and understanding they are always going to be there. But I am unhappy that Kaggle/GE announced the winners via press release at the same the rest of the competition field was notified. It makes it impossible for a competitor to dispute the final re…

> "It makes it impossible for a competitor to dispute the final results." Yes. That's the purpose. The teleology of gamified competition is toward declaring a winner. The rules are structured with that in mind. Those rules are different from the marketplace where protesting and litigation are allowed and consequently, declared winners are simply a matter of opinion, not fact. Accepting mistakes as part of the game is…

>'... declared winners are simply a matter of opinion, not fact'

I certainly agree with that part of your statement.

I have a hard time thinking about moving on to a new competition, this one has left such a bad taste in my mouth. Maybe time will change my mind, but certainly not happening any time soon.

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#14
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "It makes it impossible for a competitor to dispute the final results." Yes. That's the purpose. The teleology of gamified competition is toward declaring a winner. The rules are structured with that in mind. Those rules are different from the marketplace where protesting and litigation are allowed and consequently, declared winners are simply a matter of opinion, not fact. Accepting mistakes as part of the game is…

>'... declared winners are simply a matter of opinion, not fact' I certainly agree with that part of your statement. I have a hard time thinking about moving on to a new competition, this one has left such a bad taste in my mouth. Maybe time will change my mind, but certainly not happening any time soon.

I understand where you are coming from.

A bit of my background - I referee futbol (or as we call it, soccer). Every game, I try to give my best performance to the players. Sometimes, I make bad calls. The score is still the score.

Obviously, you're pretty damn good. Your competitors deserve to compete against you. Cheating is unfair. Mistakes aren't. Play long enough and it all evens out. At least statistically.

Good luck.

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#15
Also, does anyone else have a problem with Kaggle offering money and points for resolving the matter unofficially?

When the offer was made, I was really surprised because it seemed unethical and unfair - both the the other competitors as well as the sponsor.

Just curious what other, non-Kaggle competitor opinions are on this topic.

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#16
post #15

Also, does anyone else have a problem with Kaggle offering money and points for resolving the matter unofficially? When the offer was made, I was really surprised because it seemed unethical and unfair - both the the other competitors as well as the sponsor. Just curious what other, non-Kaggle competitor opinions are on this topic.

You have a dispute with them. They're running a business and want the dispute (and you) to go away. Eventually, you will go away, either because you gave up or lost in court; or because they paid you to do so. If you're ethically entitled to compensation, this is a perfectly decent thing for them to do.

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#17
tl;dr: contestant submitted 23 entries to a contest, rules state you have to select one for official calculation of your score, contestant changed his mind a few times and ultimately selected an entry that did not have enough points to win despite having another entry that did have enough points.

--

In reading Anthony response, this seems less about a "bug" but more about you not being happy with the results and blaming the complexity of the submission and selection process.

This part of his response seems fairly clear:

"The submission page stated: “Note: You can select up to 1 submission that will be used to calculate your final leaderboard score. If you do not select them, up to 1 entry will be chosen for you based on your most recent submissions. Your final score will not be based on the same exact subset data as the public leaderboard, but rather a different private data subset of your full submission. Your public score is only a rough indication of what your final score might be. You should choose an entry that will most likely be best overall, and not necessarily just on the public subset.”

During the course of the competition, you made 23 submissions of which 3 were selected for leaderboard scoring. First you selected submission 242748 on January 7, 2013 (all times UTC). You unselected that submission on January 24, 2013 and selected submission 250852. You unselected that submission on January 26, 2013 and selected submission 252143. You did not revise that selection at the time of your final submission. It seems logical to conclude that you understood the process of selecting submissions. Three of the other winners selected their final submission for scoring. The two that did not select the final submission had not previously made a manual selection or had unchecked prior submissions and the software worked as designed and selected the final submission. One participant (but not a winner) made 3 final submissions and selected one for scoring - which was the case the software for selecting a response was intended to handle. There was no bug in the software. "

While unfortunate for you, it is worth noting that all of the competitors had to follow the same set of submission guidelines to be considered. Your response becomes a debate on how you “feel” the submission process should work, as opposed to indicating a “bug” in the software.

“What on earth is a checkbox doing on the submission screen of a two phase competition? There is no ambiguity - there is only a single file type that is valid for the final leaderboard file. Why on earth is your software not smart enough to figure that out?

Also - why didn't the default selection logic kick in? Because only final leaderboard files are valid for the final submission, why didn't your software pick the only valid option?”

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#18
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the UK at least there are quite stringent rules on how you can run a competition - give away a car? Abide by the rules.

I did not realize this might be a gray area. I will do some research on how I can find some representation. Any tips, or experience with who I might get in contact with? Am I looking for some sort of technology or competition specialist?

http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/social-media-promotions-a...

I suggest you google for lawyer sweepstake New York

And lawyer contest law New York - talk to a couple till you get a feel for it. It about exploring your options not going to court tomorrow, so the gung-ho ones might not be best. But that's a Brit talking :-)

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#19

tl;dr: contestant submitted 23 entries to a contest, rules state you have to select one for official calculation of your score, contestant changed his mind a few times and ultimately selected an entry that did not have enough points to win despite having another entry that did have enough points. -- In reading Anthony response, this seems less about a "bug" but more about you not being happy with the results and blam…

That is a good summary, but it is a little bit more complex than what you have stated. But your comment is helpful because this is exactly the understanding that Goldbloom has and it is incorrect in an important way.

The 23 entries that were submitted are for the public leaderboard set. The purpose of this set is so over the duration of the competition, competitors can see how they are performing relative to each other. These 23 submissions have no impact on the final prize winners.

A different data set, called the final data set is what actually determines the final prize winners. I submitted this file exactly one time. It was processed and scored by Kaggle and I followed the directions exactly as the competition admin stated. I did not check a checkbox because I did not believe it applied - I only submitted a single file and I recieved the 'all zeros' response from Kaggle's system as it said it would.

Also, the text Anthony quoted is not applicable to the Flight Quest competition either. This is the text that is used for the single phase competitions, not a two phase competition like Flight Quest.

If you haven't competed before I know the difference might not be clear. But if you read the response from the other competitors in the forum, you can see there is general agreement that the submission page is faulty for a two phase competition.

Re: Ask HN: I am in a David vs. Goliath fight and I need some advice

#20
post #19

tl;dr: contestant submitted 23 entries to a contest, rules state you have to select one for official calculation of your score, contestant changed his mind a few times and ultimately selected an entry that did not have enough points to win despite having another entry that did have enough points. -- In reading Anthony response, this seems less about a "bug" but more about you not being happy with the results and blam…

That is a good summary, but it is a little bit more complex than what you have stated. But your comment is helpful because this is exactly the understanding that Goldbloom has and it is incorrect in an important way. The 23 entries that were submitted are for the public leaderboard set. The purpose of this set is so over the duration of the competition, competitors can see how they are performing relative to each oth…

Thanks for your reply and clarification.

1. So your stance is that Anthony, the CEO and Founder of Kaggle, is mistaken about the rules and execution of the 2 phase competition that his company is running, even after 8 days of his company communicating back and forth in email correspondence with you?

2. In the forum you initially state:

"As I have been saying over email repeatedly over the past 8 days, and yesterday on the phone with you and the Sorkin, there is no checkbox to check!"

..then later state:

"What on earth is a checkbox doing on the submission screen of a two phase competition? There is no ambiguity - there is only a single file type that is valid for the final leaderboard file. Why on earth is your software not smart enough to figure that out?"

and later:

"I submitted exactly one final submission. At this point the checkboxes should not matter"

and in your reply above state:

"I did not check a checkbox because I did not believe it applied"

While I'm not familiar with all of the intricacies of the competition, conflicting statements like those have me a bit confused over this whole thing.

3. $30k is a lot of money, so I sympathize with you for missing out on that given that your algorithm is better than what the final results suggest. That being said, the other entrants that won competed using the same submission process that you did, was it just bad luck that your entry was not accepted in the manner you had expected or why did they not also encounter this submission bug?

4. Is this your first two phase competition with Kaggle? Was this competition executed different than other competitions? I ask as you seem surprised/confused about this "checkbox" that appears to be at the center of the controversy.

Post reply on HN