Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
#12High cost per-seat SaaS will die. SaaS itself won't because it will always be easier to use existing software vs vibe code your own. The reason people are starting to roll their own is because with AI they can, and many SaaS products are still priced as if code is expensive. I suspect in the future SaaS products may need to move to advertisement models rather than charging per seat. I also suspect successful SaaS pro…
I sorta expect the opposite. Anyone can build some small, niche SaaS themselves now. It's the giant, hulking behemoths (Salesforce, as one example) that can't be vibe-coded away easily. I suspect we'll see far more consolidation, and SaaS will also shift towards focusing far more on the enterprise. And so cost per seat will in fact increase, is my guess. But we'll see.
I guess I'd question if people are using Salesforce because it's actually the best tool for their business at the moment.
Historically I think the main reason large generic software platforms tended to win was because they catered for the largest share of market. And as a strategy this made sense when the market couldn't create decent competitor products tailored for every business niche because of the software cost.
Now that's not really a limitation anymore I think we're starting to see businesses shift towards software which is more tailored towards their specific business requirements, and away from these large generic platforms and products (like Salesforce).
That said, there probably is some complexity threshold. If a company needs a lot of the advanced functionality of Salesforce then perhaps there's less competition. I can see how a Salesforce has more of a software moat than some SaaS products.
Re: Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
#13i'm at an investment firm, we do late stage privates and publics. we've built inhouse alternatives for most of our company tracking saas that we used for outbound/sourcing. also built in house crm.
You built these now because of AI / LLMs made it easier or because because resources / willpower / management decided to do it _now_ as opposed to _before_ ?
Re: Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
#14Re: Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
#15Gig workers too. They are already vibe coding solutions like car finding apps around ride sharing, booking engines for dog walking services, contact forms for personal coaches you might find on a flyer, etc.
For companies - it sometimes made sense before AI to build internal tooling, but it was kinda rare. And it never looked great. AI should expand and improve internal tooling, the software should look better, and be more thorough and useful. Maybe generally useful enough that more companies open-source their vibe coded solutions.
I've always loved SaaS that is open-source and you could self-host it if you wanted, but they offer a hosted version, and you still pay them because it's so convenient.
So maybe it doesn't die - the big stones (Salesforce, Hubspot) break down into smaller pebbles but there is still a lot of economic activity and tech innovation.
Personally I think there's a big opportunity for developers to try wildly new things, do things we already know but in totally new ways. Take the status quo off guard, surprise people with how easy this new way can be. But it's essentially nothing new, just a better way. And more thought into it - using the AI to do a lot more detail. A beautiful Victorian home vs a square bland house
Re: Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
#16Re: Ask HN: Is Traditional SaaS Dying?
#17The company I work for is in the process of replacing jira with an in home grown solution. They ran through a bunch of trial with pretty much every vendor under the sun looking for a replacement for jira, but none of them really sparked joy. Someone rolled their own a year or so ago, and it started gaining adoption, and people liked it enough that the whole company is switching to it. I don't think that means saas is…
Why would your company build a whole new jira just to manage tickets? What about cost and maintaince?
It also gets used for more than just ticket lifecycles. They are doing a lot of data analysis, and project management stuff.