https://imgur.com/a/OS7P9jh Seems working for me.
In the AI overview yeah, but do you see the sites below? I wonder if it's being tuned to prefer generating its own "list of X" implementations and downranking other peoples' lists.
Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
11–20 of 36 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#12Google search has generally rotted. Can't get promoted for maintenance.
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#13Google search has generally rotted. Can't get promoted for maintenance.
That’s best case scenario. Worst case is that they’re censoring the internet on a massive scale but have rolled it out slowly enough that no one noticed
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#14https://firehose.directory/robots.txt isn't one, but comes up in Google despite that.
https://atproto.at/robots.txt is good and findable with a direct search
https://atproto.wiki/robots.txt is empty but findable on Google.
https://pulsar.feeds.blue/robots.txt is 404 and thus not indexed by Google.
https://leaflet.pub/robots.txt is good. A logged in google search for this finds this for me.
Tell the people at https://pulsar.feeds.blue to fix their robots.txt if they want to get indexed.
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#15Maybe they should have used a name that wasn't already taken...
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#16Google search has generally rotted. Can't get promoted for maintenance.
That’s best case scenario. Worst case is that they’re censoring the internet on a massive scale but have rolled it out slowly enough that no one noticed
They are. There’s been a bunch of studies already showing how Google skews its results to align with oligarch interests.
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#17Maybe they should have used a name that wasn't already taken... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_AT_command_set
Lol, that's what I thought this was about too.
Why don't these people/companies think about how hard it will be to search for their $thing !?
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#18Spare us the conspiracy;
atproto.at? firehose.directory? Why would google index any of those sites with no authority/age? Maybe the owners didn't submit them to give them some credibility to start. Maybe the results vary.
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes.
Could you link it? Curious to see how buried it is for me. Personalization is one thing but on my results I'm getting Tor relays, Nostr relays, IPFS relays, and Fediverse relays and I haven't yet seen a list of atproto relays. I'm on like page 6 now.
I'm not the same commenter, but here's a Kagi share link so you can explore their results:
https://kagi.com/search?q=list+of+public+atproto+relays&r=no...
Re: Ask HN: Why isn't Google indexing information about the AT Protocol?
#20Maybe they should have used a name that wasn't already taken... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_AT_command_set
Lol, that's what I thought this was about too. Why don't these people/companies think about how hard it will be to search for their $thing !?
Yeah like /e/ os. That's hard to search for because the slash is ignored and the e is only one letter.