Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is there a quiet market for 'no enforced AI' dev jobs?

news.ycombinator.com

11–14 of 14 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is there a quiet market for 'no enforced AI' dev jobs?

#11
I suspect the market won't split into "AI companies" and "non-AI companies". It will split into companies that measure outcomes versus companies that mandate tools.

I've worked at places that mandated a particular editor, programming language, or methodology. Those mandates were rarely the reason people joined. The healthier organizations tended to define the outcome they wanted and let engineers choose the tools, provided the results justified the choice.

I wouldn't be surprised if AI ends up following the same pattern.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a quiet market for 'no enforced AI' dev jobs?

#13
post #11

I suspect the market won't split into "AI companies" and "non-AI companies". It will split into companies that measure outcomes versus companies that mandate tools. I've worked at places that mandated a particular editor, programming language, or methodology. Those mandates were rarely the reason people joined. The healthier organizations tended to define the outcome they wanted and let engineers choose the tools, pr…

> Those mandates were rarely the reason people joined.

But they are a reason people won't apply in the first place, or decide to opt out once they find out in the interview process. Pretty sure I'm not the only one that wouldn't join a Windows-only shop or one that mandates using a corporate laptop with always-on spyware.

Re: Ask HN: Is there a quiet market for 'no enforced AI' dev jobs?

#14
AI makes result oriented developers with enough agency to absolutely crush metrics and work. On the other hand, detail oriented, ticket spoon feed developers look pathetic for not being able to make same impact. Previously these two groups could co-exist were detail oriented developer would keep codebase stable and result oriented would spike new features. Now you can just spin an agent.
Post reply on HN