If you don’t control equity, you cannot control the outcome, value, or liquidity of it.
Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#12250k is good money. I'd stay, accrue experience and contacts, bank some money. The startup probably won't work out anyway - they usually don't. And even if it does, 3% equity is too low for the financial and personal sacrifices you'd have to make.
tldr: seems like the wrong time
Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#13Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#14Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#15Second, keep in mind that most startups fail, so beside the financial upside that might never materialize, you should do it for the adventure itself.
Building a startup is an amazing experience, you might start building something and end up building something completely different, you'll meet tons of inspiring people and you'll put yourself outside of your comfort zone.
The question you need to ask yourself is, do you want deep inside leave this adventure or you prefer a comfortable salary and job security. Because it will be anything but that.
Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#16Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#17Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#18Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#19Re: Ask HN: Conflicted about founding engineer role
#20They are not hiring a founding engineer because they want to do something nice. They've probably realised this path is cheaper than hiring an external software development company.
Don't think for a second that you will be an equal in this relationship. You will be at their beck and call. You will be forced to write bad code to get early sales.
You'll get paid less to do more. I would stay where you are.