Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Do you allow vibecoded submissions in your open-source projects?

news.ycombinator.com

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: Ask HN: Do you allow vibecoded submissions in your open-source projects?

#11
> The person is a long-time user and is very enthusiastic about the app.

Can this person program?

---

I agree with the the other comments. Anyway, which project? language-learning-tool?

Do you like the general idea of the PR? Is it possible to split the PR in a few smaller one? Is it possible to merge one part and keep it disabled by default for most users?

Re: Ask HN: Do you allow vibecoded submissions in your open-source projects?

#12

> The person is a long-time user and is very enthusiastic about the app. Can this person program? --- I agree with the the other comments. Anyway, which project? language-learning-tool? Do you like the general idea of the PR? Is it possible to split the PR in a few smaller one? Is it possible to merge one part and keep it disabled by default for most users?

Yes, it's the language-learning-tool.

> Do you like the general idea of the PR?

To be honest, I'm not a fan of the PR's general idea.

> Is it possible to merge one part and keep it disabled by default for most users?

This is exactly what I am about to do. To merge a small part of that PR into my repo. That part conducts communication between the web app and the proposed extension, so the author of the PR can use my APIs while keeping most of their code in their fork.

I am actually glad that I created this thread. Thank you for responding to it.

Re: Ask HN: Do you allow vibecoded submissions in your open-source projects?

#13
Honestly I reached a point where I was getting pull-requests which were best characterized as "AI spam", I just archived all of them.

Every single one of my public github repositories is archived and no longer updated.

I have projects I work on, but I keep them to myself. I've just lost interest in wasting time on issues and submissions from people - which is a depressing position to be in, because most of the time people mean well, and over the years I've definitely benefited from contributions of many interested and skilled people.

Re: Ask HN: Do you allow vibecoded submissions in your open-source projects?

#14

Honestly I reached a point where I was getting pull-requests which were best characterized as "AI spam", I just archived all of them. Every single one of my public github repositories is archived and no longer updated. I have projects I work on, but I keep them to myself. I've just lost interest in wasting time on issues and submissions from people - which is a depressing position to be in, because most of the time p…

I created this thread thinking that AI is definitely going to shake the open-source world, and I wanted to know how people deal with AI-slop PRs.

Thank you for sharing your experience. I am not an open-source rockstar, and I have only had to reject PRs a few times in my life. All the times I felt terrible for people who put in some effort to build something around my code and got rejected.

Re: Ask HN: Do you allow vibecoded submissions in your open-source projects?

#15
post #14

Honestly I reached a point where I was getting pull-requests which were best characterized as "AI spam", I just archived all of them. Every single one of my public github repositories is archived and no longer updated. I have projects I work on, but I keep them to myself. I've just lost interest in wasting time on issues and submissions from people - which is a depressing position to be in, because most of the time p…

I created this thread thinking that AI is definitely going to shake the open-source world, and I wanted to know how people deal with AI-slop PRs. Thank you for sharing your experience. I am not an open-source rockstar, and I have only had to reject PRs a few times in my life. All the times I felt terrible for people who put in some effort to build something around my code and got rejected.

Even if you reject their changes remember they have their own fork, and they can keep using it locally. Sure they have to keep updating their local work if you don't include it in your repository, but that's a small price to pay. After all if you hadn't made your code available in the first place nobody would be using it, modified, or unmodified.
Post reply on HN