* Anthony Bourdain - Kitchen Confidential
* Bessel van der Kolk - The Body Keeps the Score
11–20 of 29 posts
* Anthony Bourdain - Kitchen Confidential
* Bessel van der Kolk - The Body Keeps the Score
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you believe in his ideas? I think the abundist philosophy is a fake moustache and a coat of paint on third way neoliberalism, which has proven time and again to have utterly failed as a political strategy in our current era. Ezra Klein’s ideas mostly feel tired, recycled, boring, outdated, and rudderless. We need true labor reform in this country, not less regulations and more trust in “altruistic developers”.
Pretty rude response, right?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty rude response, right?
It is an opinion. Interestingly because of that opinion I am actually looking at the book. At least reading the Wiki summary.
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
by Carl Sagan
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is an opinion. Interestingly because of that opinion I am actually looking at the book. At least reading the Wiki summary.
The original commenter answered the question of the thread: "here's a book I'm reading". They got in response a screed about "neoliberal" politics. That the response is wrong is besides the point: it was a really rude way to respond to someone recommending a book. The civil and productive way to write that response would have been to recommend in addition another, countervailing book.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The original commenter answered the question of the thread: "here's a book I'm reading". They got in response a screed about "neoliberal" politics. That the response is wrong is besides the point: it was a really rude way to respond to someone recommending a book. The civil and productive way to write that response would have been to recommend in addition another, countervailing book.
He's trying to have discussion, who are you to tell people how to communicate?
Starts in somewhat current time and follows humanity’s trajectory for the next 30-ish years.
I found it especially interesting because it does expose and address the socioeconomic issues preventing us from taking action on climate.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is an opinion. Interestingly because of that opinion I am actually looking at the book. At least reading the Wiki summary.
The original commenter answered the question of the thread: "here's a book I'm reading". They got in response a screed about "neoliberal" politics. That the response is wrong is besides the point: it was a really rude way to respond to someone recommending a book. The civil and productive way to write that response would have been to recommend in addition another, countervailing book.