Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How common is banning Docker?

news.ycombinator.com

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: Ask HN: How common is banning Docker?

#11
Just out of curiosity, what does the dev env look like? A set of VMs? K8s? If k8s, then mirrord for teams can be useful for testing code locally against the dev env dependencies without having to containerize while also not breaking the shared env dependencies for others.

Disclaimer: I work for the parent company

Re: Ask HN: How common is banning Docker?

#12
post #3

It is not common and as you could have figured from the rest of this arrangement, it's just yes, this organisation is broken. Which is usually a good thing, broken places are usually to make money off that's why they remain broken for a long time - some places might go under because of that, but not a bank.

Banning docker equals to broken company to you? Please, have your opinion, but dont run around spreading absurd claims...

Re: Ask HN: How common is banning Docker?

#13
I was in an Indian service company and worked for Indian and US branches of a company. The regulations were high, employees know more stuff and people and *carve out* a streamlined workflow, we contractors have to obey the rules literally, our feedback are Chinese whispers (me, my manager, their manager...) and we have to fend for themselves.

For specific stories. We had Windows virtual desktops. Our unit test suites assume an Unix environment like the employees Macs or Jenkins, so we had to coax Jenkins to run our feature branches and there may be 12 hour waits for our builds. We also had to plan leaves around their quarterly plans and hard deadlines while they they never treated quarterly plans as deadlines or cycles. Debugging with client is affected by timezone differences too.

Re: Ask HN: How common is banning Docker?

#14

Every environment is a copy of the data, I would imagine. I think you would want to limit spawning of copies of your data in an offshore outsourced environment for security reasons. That's my guess.

Banks use test data. Dev should never see Prod.

Re: Ask HN: How common is banning Docker?

#15
post #12
post #3

It is not common and as you could have figured from the rest of this arrangement, it's just yes, this organisation is broken. Which is usually a good thing, broken places are usually to make money off that's why they remain broken for a long time - some places might go under because of that, but not a bank.

Banning docker equals to broken company to you? Please, have your opinion, but dont run around spreading absurd claims...

No, it is the fact that they outsource their IT to the lowest bidder and surround their work with ridiculous limitations our of the false hope of savings, that both destroy productivity, and make accountability impossible.

It's fine, many large orgs are like this.

Post reply on HN