Earlier quoted context omitted.
ah yeah that makes sense — sounds like you're indexing for traceability first, which honestly makes your graph setup way more stable than most RAG stacks I’ve seen. I’m more on the side of: “why is this even the logic path the system thinks makes sense for the user’s intent?” — like, how did we get from prompt to retrieval to that hallucination? So I stopped treating retrieval as the answer. It’s just an echo. I star…
Thanks :) And really cool stuff you’re doing too. Honestly I have not spent as much time as maybe I should really diving into all the LLM tooling and stuff like you have. Good luck!!
I think the whole LLM space is still missing a core idea: that logic routing before retrieval might be more important than retrieval itself. when the LLM “hallucinates,” it’s not always because it lacked facts — sometimes it just followed a bad question.
but yeah — if any part of this helps or sparks new stuff, then we’re already winning. appreciate the good vibes, and good luck on your own build too